 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 2916 | 回復: 18 | ||
zhzimi_2007木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
[求助]
投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助！
|
|
有投過European Journal of Operational Research的蟲友嗎？向您請教一個問題？ 我11年初向European Journal of Operational Research投了一篇稿子，11年末編輯回信拒了，回信如下： I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration. The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready. From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret. In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the "major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time. 經(jīng)過修改后于12年初重投給該雜志，最近編輯回信又拒了，回信如下： I am enclosing below the referees' comments on your paper, which has received very serious consideration. The paper is presently unacceptable because of deficiencies listed in the reports, although the idea is interesting. As there is some potential for a good paper, we encourage you to continue your research in this direction and to resubmit a re-written paper to the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH when it will be ready. From my experience, a new submission which has a fair chance to be finally accepted, needs a considerable amount of work and time. So please do not mistake this decision to be of the type "major revision and re-evaluation". At this stage, it is a rejection, to my regret. In addition, I would suggest you provide a detailed response to the referee's remarks (only in this respect, the procedure is similar to the "major revision" case). This would speed up the procedure next time. 通過審稿意見可以看出審稿人還是原先的兩個審稿人，兩個人都要求修改。 我想請教一下有過European Journal of Operational Research投稿經(jīng)驗的朋友，上面的兩次回信一模一樣，是不是都是European Journal of Operational Research編輯們拒稿的模版啊。編輯其實只是客套一下，事實上并不喜歡你的文章，并不準備接受你的文章。如果是這種情況的話，我就不再重投這個雜志了。 還是編輯就是這樣，拒了讓你修改重投，再拒了再讓你修改重投，直至接收，中間沒有大修或小修這種狀態(tài)。如果是這種情況的話，那我就繼續(xù)修改再重投這個雜志了。 [ Last edited by seapass on 2012-4-14 at 14:16 ] |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿華中科技大學071000，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
生物學一志愿985，分數(shù)349求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
生物學調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
求調(diào)劑院校信息
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
085600材料與化工306
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復
-
328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有9人回復
-
一志愿北京化工大學070300 學碩336求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
286分人工智能專業(yè)請求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！
已經(jīng)有8人回復
-
資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(333分)
已經(jīng)有5人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- chemistry a european journal投稿求助
已經(jīng)有3人回復
- 投稿European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry時間太長，什么原因？
已經(jīng)有6人回復
- european polymer journal 投稿求助
已經(jīng)有2人回復
- European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 投稿求助
已經(jīng)有6人回復
- 有沒有第一次投稿european polymer journal的各種文件的模板及要求啊
已經(jīng)有6人回復
- European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 投稿狀態(tài)
已經(jīng)有7人回復
- European Heart Journal 投稿請教
已經(jīng)有1人回復
- chenmistry a european journal 投稿狀態(tài)
已經(jīng)有18人回復
- European Polymer Journal 投稿word模板（主要是投稿格式）
已經(jīng)有13人回復
- 投稿European Polymer Journal 一個月了，狀態(tài)還是with editor，正常嗎？
已經(jīng)有5人回復
- 投稿European Polymer Journal 近一個月了，狀態(tài)還是with editor，正常嗎？
已經(jīng)有3人回復
- Central European Journal of Physics 投稿求助
已經(jīng)有7人回復
- 投稿European Journal of Operational Research求助！
已經(jīng)有12人回復
- European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 投稿求助
已經(jīng)有1人回復
- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY投稿
已經(jīng)有0人回復
- 投稿EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY 的一點疑問
已經(jīng)有8人回復
- Central European Journal of Chemistry 投稿求助
已經(jīng)有3人回復
- European Polymer Journal投稿狀態(tài)
已經(jīng)有1人回復
- 求助投稿European Polymer Journal
已經(jīng)有8人回復
- European Polymer Journal投稿求助
已經(jīng)有3人回復
- European polymer journal 投稿狀態(tài)
已經(jīng)有3人回復
嘯天犬
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 2171 (講師)
- 金幣: 9715.1
- 紅花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在線: 302.2小時
- 蟲號: 1362468
- 注冊: 2011-08-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 水文地質(zhì)學(含地熱地質(zhì)學)
2樓2012-04-11 09:36:59
seapass
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 應助: 772 (博后)
- 貴賓: 3.074
- 金幣: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 紅花: 82
- 沙發(fā): 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在線: 930.8小時
- 蟲號: 441856
- 注冊: 2007-10-27
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 海洋環(huán)境科學
3樓2012-04-11 09:38:00
zhzimi_2007
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1759.3
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 3631
- 在線: 703.6小時
- 蟲號: 450803
- 注冊: 2007-11-04
- 專業(yè): 應用數(shù)學方法
4樓2012-04-11 09:40:52
zhzimi_2007
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1759.3
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 3631
- 在線: 703.6小時
- 蟲號: 450803
- 注冊: 2007-11-04
- 專業(yè): 應用數(shù)學方法
5樓2012-04-11 09:41:35
嘯天犬
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 2171 (講師)
- 金幣: 9715.1
- 紅花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在線: 302.2小時
- 蟲號: 1362468
- 注冊: 2011-08-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 水文地質(zhì)學(含地熱地質(zhì)學)
6樓2012-04-11 09:43:37
zhzimi_2007
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1759.3
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 3631
- 在線: 703.6小時
- 蟲號: 450803
- 注冊: 2007-11-04
- 專業(yè): 應用數(shù)學方法
7樓2012-04-11 09:45:28
zhzimi_2007
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1759.3
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 3631
- 在線: 703.6小時
- 蟲號: 450803
- 注冊: 2007-11-04
- 專業(yè): 應用數(shù)學方法
|
我把最近的審稿意見發(fā)給您，您幫我看看： Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1: In my side of view this paper has some originality regarding to its application. Even, the author tries to mix different theories with each others, finally it give a bright-full results. However, I think there are lots of area that should be corrected and I think it was because of different amendments which were added to this paper after its first review. 1- The introduction is completely vast however it becomes to complicated while it just speak about history of the methods in details but it doesn't go through their application and definitions in general during introduction of the paper. I recommend author to re-structured the introduction and make it more readable for scholars. 2- It is a necessary to add a graphical chart at the end of introduction to avoid complication among history. the graphical chart should show the different areas that author mentioned about them and then it should illustrate the interactions and finally the contribution of this paper should be stared in the figure. It help to show the area of knowledge that author was explored in his study. 3- the contribution of this paper should be more highlighted at the end of introduction. 4- some small English errors should be corrected such as page one, line 48, in the middle, it should be "in recent years,..." 5- the structure of paper does not obey the standard form of normal academic papers, maybe some definitions should come under methodology, and results and discussions should be more highlighted rather than lots of complicated Remarks. 6- Since the strength of this paper is more in its application, it needs to be more strong on this issue. The examples should be more applied and even some example could be comparative example which shows any differences between this method and previous ones. 7- In page 3, Line 30, It is not suitable for academic paper to use "we"! 8- The procedure of this method should be illustrated by aid of graphical chart. 9- Conclusion should be more precise. 10- Using lots of references even at the end of the paper in remarks and results is not common and suitable at all. maybe they can be introduced as a significance of study in the introduction and at the end, the contributions should be mentioned alone. 11- Technically I like this mathematical solution in decision making. However, it will be so complicated for some scholars! Reviewer #2: The paper must be completely restructured. Indeed, in its current form, the author presents: - A set of definitions, remarks, examples, but without given textual explanations before giving the mathematical formulation. - There are no apparent links between the different definitions, sections, etc. etc. It should be important to: - Explain with few words or in few lines, what is the contribution of the each definition. - Propose the definitions with explanations, positioning, and links with what follow. - Highlight the most important definitions to highlight the contribution of the author proportion. On page 11, page where the author presents the proposal, we find a set of definitions, remarks and examples. At page 11: It would be interesting that the author present the examples discussed by (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a), and position its results regarding the obtained results by these authors. The goal is to have some elements of comparison. Page 20: At the end of section 3 (proposed approach) there is no balance and the relationship between sections 3 and 4 (the author deal with 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making', again without link, explanations .). We must wait the page 25 for having explanations: the author explains the benefits of its proposition, but as he does not position this proposition regarding other examples (examples discussed in (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a)) ? The interest is not highlighted. At the end of page 25, the explanations are presented without giving links with the different definitions, remarks, examples (presented at the beginning of the paper) ? the benefit of the proposed approach is less visible. It is also the case for 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making' section. Moreover, the author does not position its proposition, without links . A discussion on the types of problems that can be used with the proposed approach is important. What about the following works: (Wang et al., 2009), (Zhang, 2011) regarding the proposed paper: Zhoujing Wang, Kevin W. Li, Weize Wang, 2009, An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights. Information Sciences 179, 3026-3040. Zhiming Zhang, 2011, A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling. |
8樓2012-04-11 09:51:52
seapass
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 應助: 772 (博后)
- 貴賓: 3.074
- 金幣: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 紅花: 82
- 沙發(fā): 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在線: 930.8小時
- 蟲號: 441856
- 注冊: 2007-10-27
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 海洋環(huán)境科學
9樓2012-04-11 09:56:16
嘯天犬
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 2171 (講師)
- 金幣: 9715.1
- 紅花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在線: 302.2小時
- 蟲號: 1362468
- 注冊: 2011-08-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 水文地質(zhì)學(含地熱地質(zhì)學)
10樓2012-04-11 09:57:23
相關版塊跳轉
我要訂閱樓主 zhzimi_2007 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +10 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +5 | 87639 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研化學學碩調(diào)劑，一志愿985 +5 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +3 | 喜歡還是不甘心 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
學校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC，還能修改嗎？
 40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梨花珞晚風 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國石油大學（華東） 本科齊魯工業(yè)大學 +3 | 石能偉 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +12 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 271材料工程求調(diào)劑
+8
|
.6lL 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 南京大學化學376求調(diào)劑 +3 | hisfailed 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +9 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 +8 | 安全上岸！ 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研]
材料與化工 322求調(diào)劑
+4
|
然11 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3 | ￣^￣゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 295復試調(diào)劑
+8
|
簡木ChuFront 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +22 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 22/1100 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +6 | 懷瑾握瑜l 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +8 | 陌宸希 2026-03-16 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑 +4 | Du.11 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|