| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2752 | 回復(fù): 9 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
gc452金蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
編輯回復(fù),幫忙翻譯下
|
|
|
投了一篇英文,編輯給回復(fù):Dear Dr Ma, I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "Characterization of the particle size fractions associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China" (Dr Lingling Ma). I am pleased to say that it has been favourably received and publication with minor revision is recommended (see below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/gexplo/). Please consider the reviews to see if revision would be feasible. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text of your manuscript. Should you wish to resubmit you should explain how and where (i.e. by giving line numbers) each point of the reviewers' comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked" . Please follow the order "Revision Notes", "Revision, changes marked", "Manuscript", etc.Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors. Given that the requested revisions are fairly minor the new version is required within the month. To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/gexplo/ and log in as an author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision. When resubmitting, please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues. When resubmitting, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word) of all text and tables. Uploading a pdf file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I hope that you will find the comments to be of use to you and am looking forward with interest to receiving your revision. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Kind regards, Kreeti Saravanan Journal Manager Journal of Geochemical Exploration .......................................................... Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided. COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS You may obtain the specific comments from two reviewers for your manuscript and should revise the manuscript as well as a point-by-point reply to the comments. After you have taken care of all the suggestions, you can resubmit the modified paper to be evaluated for acceptance for publication on JGE. Following, some associate editor suggestions to authors: (1) Lines 227: Pichler et al., 1996 is not in the references Reviewer #1: This paper contains data of potential interest to an international scientific community. The English language and the general composition of the manuscript is quite satisfactory. The following comments apply to the manuscript: - The use of decimals is generally excessive. Only one digit more than the last significant one should be listed. This applies to the Abstract (% micro-aggregates), Results and Discussion, and Table 1. As an example: If the accuracy of the Cr determination is 5% (it is hardly any better as judged from the analysis of SRMs)the numbers for this element in Table 1 should be given with only 3 significant digits (e.g. 204 instead of 204.27 and 21.2 instead of 21.21). - In the abstract it is stated that the mobility of the metals was "analyzed". What was studied is rather the "leachability". - In fig. line explaining the symbols used should be moved to the figure text. The figure looks to "busy" as it is now. Reviewer #2: Soil pollution by heavy metal is getting worse with the rapid development economy in China. This ms. presented the characteristics of heavy metals in tropical arable soils in Hainan Island, China. I considered that this ms. can be accepted for publication after a minor revision. The detailed comments are as follows: 1. What is the detection limit of TOC measurement? 2. Page 8 line 159, the section of "2.4 Statistical analysis" is unnecessary in the article. 3. The authors should add some appropriate discussion related to the source of heavy metals. 4. There are many syntax error and punctuation abuse. I suggest the authors finding native English persons to help with the ms.. 哪個(gè)蟲友幫忙翻譯下,謝謝 |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)


木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +10 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | DLkz1314. 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +8 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +5 | 亞克西good 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中師范化學(xué)332分求調(diào)劑 +3 | Lyy930824@ 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[有機(jī)交流] 考研調(diào)劑 +8 | watb 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | @MZB382400 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 【求調(diào)劑】085601材料工程專碩 | 總分272 | +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +10 | 鈕恩雪 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑考研 +3 | 王杰一 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +4 | akie... 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | raojunqi0129 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +6 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +10 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 柚柚yoyo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京郵電大學(xué) 288分 材料考研 求調(diào)劑 +3 | jl0720 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩總分317求調(diào)劑!。! +4 | Acaciad 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|