| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2494 | 回復(fù): 6 | ||||
clara7368鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審回復(fù)郵件,major revision的疑問(wèn)?
|
|
本人投稿一篇SSCI,3月投的,一審還挺快,今天收到郵件,讓我大修,大概看了兩個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn),一個(gè)審稿人幾乎讓我把方法的部分重寫,很頭疼...;另一個(gè)審稿人很友善,基本讓我小修。。。 另外,責(zé)編后來(lái)加了一句話,如下: Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 這個(gè)是什么意思?是修改后再送審的幾率很小嗎?也就是說(shuō)我大修之后很可能連二審的機(jī)會(huì)都很小,發(fā)表的幾率就更小了? 如果這樣,我都不想改了,改投它刊算了? 請(qǐng)各位童鞋給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn)啊,謝謝! ![]() ![]() (附審稿意見(jiàn)) COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no doubt that the paper will generate a good number of interesting and valuable implications to school management specifically on matters that relate to access and equity in education. To ensure that the paper assumes its merit in both substance and form, may I suggest that the following pointers be adequately addressed by the researchers. 1. While the introduction provides a succinct description of the current trends and issues raised by scholars in the field, I suggest that toward the end of it, the authors provide a paragraph that details the unique benefits that may accrue from the conduct of this scholarly and empirical investigation. Specifically, pinpoint the contributions of the paper to educational management practice and policy. 2. I strongly suggest that a section for the theoretical underpinning of the paper be provided. This is vital in justifying the main argument of the paper. 3. I also would like to suggest that a section on Literature Review and Hypotheses Development be substantially presented. Have a separate synthesis of relevant literature relative to the following variables: parental characteristics, family situation, school accessibility and educational quality. Toward the end of each review, highlight the argument that the research wishes to advance in the form of H1, H2, H3, H4... 4. Kindly rehash the methods section by having a clear-cut segmentation of the following: design, subjects and study site, data measures, data collection procedure, data analysis. 5. Separate the results from the discussion part. See to it that a substantial number of literature culled from ISI journals including the ones of TAPER be cross-referenced in the discussion section and provide also some bold attempt and implications to management practice and policy. 6. Kindly remove the doi information for references beyond 2012. This only applies for articles that are still in press. 7. Kindly have the paper edited by a native speaker of English. Looking forward to receiving the revised copy of this promising paper. Reviewer #2: 1. Abstract is concise and clear, however, the author needs to include the methodology (number of participants, data analysis….) in 1 or 2 short sentences describing how data is gathered and analyzed. 2. Basically, the results and arguments of the paper are well represented. What concerns me is that whether the merging of school is more efficient in the long run or is only a short-term solution. Could the suggested policy be applied to similar situations in other countries? Is SMR only an issue in China? The author needs to provide more information. 3. Does the survey include students' information, such as their performance and grades? Efficiency models can be developed using the existing school factors and students' information. 4. In sum, the study seems to be a fine study and has provided some important findings. However, the conclusion part of the paper should be tightened to indicate the major findings and highlight what the paper has achieved. [ Last edited by clara7368 on 2013-5-1 at 12:18 ] |
頂 |
木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
|
Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 你修改的論文能否錄用取決于你是否很好地解決了審稿人和編輯提出的問(wèn)題。就是這個(gè)意思,挺正常的。 |
鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!

鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數(shù)二 +9 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +5 | 簡(jiǎn)單點(diǎn)0 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小熊joy 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 085601專碩,總分342求調(diào)劑,地區(qū)不限 +4 | share_joy 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yy7400 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +6 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-15 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 290分有科研經(jīng)歷,論文在投 +7 | 膩膩gk 2026-03-14 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
笨笨兔子 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化,一志愿:哈工大 本人本科雙一流 +4 | 自由的_飛翔 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)一志愿211 總分320求調(diào)劑 +5 | 瑪卡巴卡啊哈 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 工科,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我887 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +8 | 困于星晨 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料301分求調(diào)劑 +5 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山大07化學(xué) 332分 四六級(jí)已過(guò) 本科山東雙非 求調(diào)劑! +3 | 不想理你 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|