| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2518 | 回復(fù): 6 | ||||
clara7368鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審回復(fù)郵件,major revision的疑問?
|
|
本人投稿一篇SSCI,3月投的,一審還挺快,今天收到郵件,讓我大修,大概看了兩個(gè)審稿人的意見,一個(gè)審稿人幾乎讓我把方法的部分重寫,很頭疼...;另一個(gè)審稿人很友善,基本讓我小修。。。 另外,責(zé)編后來加了一句話,如下: Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 這個(gè)是什么意思?是修改后再送審的幾率很小嗎?也就是說我大修之后很可能連二審的機(jī)會(huì)都很小,發(fā)表的幾率就更小了? 如果這樣,我都不想改了,改投它刊算了? 請(qǐng)各位童鞋給點(diǎn)意見啊,謝謝! ![]() ![]() (附審稿意見) COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no doubt that the paper will generate a good number of interesting and valuable implications to school management specifically on matters that relate to access and equity in education. To ensure that the paper assumes its merit in both substance and form, may I suggest that the following pointers be adequately addressed by the researchers. 1. While the introduction provides a succinct description of the current trends and issues raised by scholars in the field, I suggest that toward the end of it, the authors provide a paragraph that details the unique benefits that may accrue from the conduct of this scholarly and empirical investigation. Specifically, pinpoint the contributions of the paper to educational management practice and policy. 2. I strongly suggest that a section for the theoretical underpinning of the paper be provided. This is vital in justifying the main argument of the paper. 3. I also would like to suggest that a section on Literature Review and Hypotheses Development be substantially presented. Have a separate synthesis of relevant literature relative to the following variables: parental characteristics, family situation, school accessibility and educational quality. Toward the end of each review, highlight the argument that the research wishes to advance in the form of H1, H2, H3, H4... 4. Kindly rehash the methods section by having a clear-cut segmentation of the following: design, subjects and study site, data measures, data collection procedure, data analysis. 5. Separate the results from the discussion part. See to it that a substantial number of literature culled from ISI journals including the ones of TAPER be cross-referenced in the discussion section and provide also some bold attempt and implications to management practice and policy. 6. Kindly remove the doi information for references beyond 2012. This only applies for articles that are still in press. 7. Kindly have the paper edited by a native speaker of English. Looking forward to receiving the revised copy of this promising paper. Reviewer #2: 1. Abstract is concise and clear, however, the author needs to include the methodology (number of participants, data analysis….) in 1 or 2 short sentences describing how data is gathered and analyzed. 2. Basically, the results and arguments of the paper are well represented. What concerns me is that whether the merging of school is more efficient in the long run or is only a short-term solution. Could the suggested policy be applied to similar situations in other countries? Is SMR only an issue in China? The author needs to provide more information. 3. Does the survey include students' information, such as their performance and grades? Efficiency models can be developed using the existing school factors and students' information. 4. In sum, the study seems to be a fine study and has provided some important findings. However, the conclusion part of the paper should be tightened to indicate the major findings and highlight what the paper has achieved. [ Last edited by clara7368 on 2013-5-1 at 12:18 ] |
頂 |
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
|
Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 你修改的論文能否錄用取決于你是否很好地解決了審稿人和編輯提出的問題。就是這個(gè)意思,挺正常的。 |
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!

鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 英一數(shù)一總分334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 陳陽坤 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿085600中科院寧波所276分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +6 | xiao愛同學(xué) 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)279求調(diào)劑 +7 | 哈哈哈^_^ 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 本科211總分289,08工學(xué)真心求調(diào)劑 +3 | utopiaE 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學(xué)有機(jī)化學(xué)專業(yè),初試351分,復(fù)試被刷求調(diào)劑! +7 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 11408總分309,一志愿東南大學(xué)求調(diào)劑,不挑專業(yè) +5 | 天賦帶到THU 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +9 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +14 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研]
|
gr哈哈哈 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +8 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 394求調(diào)劑 +3 | 好事多磨靜候佳?/a> 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑,各位老師看看我。。 +5 | 祁祺祺 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 零八# 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑,一志愿南農(nóng)083200食品科學(xué)與工程 +5 | XQTJZ 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 打過很多競(jìng)賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿蘇州大學(xué)初始315(英一)求調(diào)劑 +3 | sbdksD 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085500機(jī)械專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +3 | an10101 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|