 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2505 | 回復(fù): 6 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
clara7368鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審回復(fù)郵件，major revision的疑問？
|
|||
|
本人投稿一篇SSCI，3月投的，一審還挺快，今天收到郵件，讓我大修，大概看了兩個審稿人的意見，一個審稿人幾乎讓我把方法的部分重寫，很頭疼...；另一個審稿人很友善，基本讓我小修。。。 另外，責(zé)編后來加了一句話，如下： Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 這個是什么意思？是修改后再送審的幾率很小嗎？也就是說我大修之后很可能連二審的機會都很小，發(fā)表的幾率就更小了？ 如果這樣，我都不想改了，改投它刊算了？ 請各位童鞋給點意見啊，謝謝！   (附審稿意見) COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no doubt that the paper will generate a good number of interesting and valuable implications to school management specifically on matters that relate to access and equity in education. To ensure that the paper assumes its merit in both substance and form, may I suggest that the following pointers be adequately addressed by the researchers. 1. While the introduction provides a succinct description of the current trends and issues raised by scholars in the field, I suggest that toward the end of it, the authors provide a paragraph that details the unique benefits that may accrue from the conduct of this scholarly and empirical investigation. Specifically, pinpoint the contributions of the paper to educational management practice and policy. 2. I strongly suggest that a section for the theoretical underpinning of the paper be provided. This is vital in justifying the main argument of the paper. 3. I also would like to suggest that a section on Literature Review and Hypotheses Development be substantially presented. Have a separate synthesis of relevant literature relative to the following variables: parental characteristics, family situation, school accessibility and educational quality. Toward the end of each review, highlight the argument that the research wishes to advance in the form of H1, H2, H3, H4... 4. Kindly rehash the methods section by having a clear-cut segmentation of the following: design, subjects and study site, data measures, data collection procedure, data analysis. 5. Separate the results from the discussion part. See to it that a substantial number of literature culled from ISI journals including the ones of TAPER be cross-referenced in the discussion section and provide also some bold attempt and implications to management practice and policy. 6. Kindly remove the doi information for references beyond 2012. This only applies for articles that are still in press. 7. Kindly have the paper edited by a native speaker of English. Looking forward to receiving the revised copy of this promising paper. Reviewer #2: 1. Abstract is concise and clear, however, the author needs to include the methodology (number of participants, data analysis….) in 1 or 2 short sentences describing how data is gathered and analyzed. 2. Basically, the results and arguments of the paper are well represented. What concerns me is that whether the merging of school is more efficient in the long run or is only a short-term solution. Could the suggested policy be applied to similar situations in other countries? Is SMR only an issue in China? The author needs to provide more information. 3. Does the survey include students' information, such as their performance and grades? Efficiency models can be developed using the existing school factors and students' information. 4. In sum, the study seems to be a fine study and has provided some important findings. However, the conclusion part of the paper should be tightened to indicate the major findings and highlight what the paper has achieved. [ Last edited by clara7368 on 2013-5-1 at 12:18 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
0856調(diào)劑，是學(xué)校就去
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
申博26年
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ，六級已過，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
288求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
307求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
288求調(diào)劑，一志愿華南理工大學(xué)071005
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 大家一般對于major revision一般多久后提交返回稿？ JLT
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- major revision提交后一直是with editor，希望大嗎？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 投了elsevier的一個期刊,要major revision,修改后接受的概率?
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 第三次major revision
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- major revision 后多少天提交文章，有沒有什么需要考慮的，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有27人回復(fù)
- major revision 大家看有希望嗎
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 麻煩大牛看一下我這個major revision該任何修改？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- Acta Materialia論文Major Revision Requiring Re-review的一些疑問。
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 請問minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么區(qū)分的？
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- major revision完事后，幾天能收到意見~
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- major revision問題 求助
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 困惑~~ 只有一個比較細(xì)節(jié)的comments，編輯卻給了我major revision
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 投了一篇文章，審稿結(jié)果是“major revision”，幫忙看看評審意見，有戲沒？
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 獲得Major revision，這樣的主編與評審建議有機會嗎？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 有沒有遭遇過兩次Major Revision的？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 一篇文章major revision后，審稿意見已經(jīng)回來1周了，還是沒有消息
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- Major revision and reconsideration還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- major revision 后該怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
clara7368
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 77.2
- 散金: 3
- 帖子: 73
- 在線: 11.9小時
- 蟲號: 778197
- 注冊: 2009-05-24
- 專業(yè): 教育經(jīng)濟學(xué)
5樓2013-05-01 13:31:26
goslar
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!
- 應(yīng)助: 118 (高中生)
- 金幣: 3592.7
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 3115
- 在線: 174.5小時
- 蟲號: 1547023
- 注冊: 2011-12-22
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 免疫生物學(xué)
3樓2013-05-01 12:58:03
nono2009
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 28684 (院士)
- 貴賓: 513.911
- 金幣: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 紅花: 2148
- 沙發(fā): 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在線: 65200.9小時
- 蟲號: 827383
- 注冊: 2009-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 工程熱物理與能源利用
- 管轄: 科研家籌備委員會
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
clara7368: 金幣+5, ★有幫助, 謝謝！ 2013-05-01 13:29:07
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
clara7368: 金幣+5, ★有幫助, 謝謝！ 2013-05-01 13:29:07
|
Please note that there is NO guarantee for your revised manuscript to be accepted for publication. If your revised manuscript does not FULLY address the reviewers' and editor's comments, it will be rejected. Only in EXCEPTIONAL cases will a second revision be allowed. 你修改的論文能否錄用取決于你是否很好地解決了審稿人和編輯提出的問題。就是這個意思，挺正常的。 |
4樓2013-05-01 13:18:10
goslar
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!
- 應(yīng)助: 118 (高中生)
- 金幣: 3592.7
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 3115
- 在線: 174.5小時
- 蟲號: 1547023
- 注冊: 2011-12-22
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 免疫生物學(xué)
clara73686樓2013-05-01 13:33:41
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩 +13 | 陌の森林 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 梁成偉老師課題組歡迎你的加入 +9 | 一鴨鴨喲 2026-03-14 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)（081702）315分求調(diào)劑 +11 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數(shù)二 +10 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +8 | 陌宸希 2026-03-16 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料，紡織，生物（0856、0710），化學(xué)招生啦 +3 | Eember. 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 被我言中：新模板不強調(diào)格式了，假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 橘頌. 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大口吃飯 身體健 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風(fēng)就是雨； 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 0703方向310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化，一志愿：哈工大 本人本科雙一流 +4 | 自由的_飛翔 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297一志愿上交085600求調(diào)劑 +5 | 指尖八千里 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考博] 福州大學(xué)楊黃浩課題組招收2026年專業(yè)學(xué)位博士研究生，2026.03.20截止 +3 | Xiangyu_ou 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|