 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 4060 | 回復(fù): 53 | ||
[求助]
論文被拒兩次了，現(xiàn)在不知道怎么辦了，求教各位蟲友
|
||
|
論文第一次投是在今年5月份，后來7月份收到拒稿信，然后根據(jù)兩位審稿人的意見進(jìn)行了大幅度的修改和增添內(nèi)容（由原來的4000字左右增加到了6000多字），也增加了一個(gè)跟其他文獻(xiàn)的對(duì)比實(shí)驗(yàn)；第二次是在8月8日投出去的，現(xiàn)在剛又收到拒稿信了。主要是說我文章的創(chuàng)新性和contribution不足，可是我在第一部分已經(jīng)結(jié)論中都已經(jīng)提到本文的contribution和創(chuàng)新性了啊。而且按照審稿意見，貌似審稿人希望的是系統(tǒng)中各個(gè)模塊都應(yīng)該有創(chuàng)新性，可是一篇文章哪來那么多創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)啊？ 下面將審稿意見貼出來，大家?guī)臀铱纯聪乱徊皆撛趺崔k吧？這種情況下是不是申訴也意義不大了��？哎，論文從寫作到投稿再到修改，老板從來沒有過問過，想讓他幫我看看也沒有空的，就說先投出去看回來的審稿意見再修改好了，可是。。。做學(xué)生的哪里來的那么多時(shí)間和精力來回折騰啊  In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in ***. We all appreciate your efforts to improve the paper however it is still weak and for any future papers you should be sure to highlight the original elements of your work. For a paper to be published in our journal it must add significantly to the body of existing work. I think you need to take your research further and deeper. Reviewer: 1 Comments: 1. Originality: The authors have made a significant effort to improve the paper by amending the questions pointed out by this reviewer; nevertheless, the contribution is still weak. 2. Relationship to Literature: Yes, the authors seem to have a good knowledge about the related publications and they took into account the reviewer's suggestion of including and commenting the work from Smart (2007). 3. Methodology: Tables I to IV have been removed and the information included as text, which is an acceptable solution. Fig 12 (Fig 17 in the reviewed version) has been explained a little bit. However, the methodology remains as it was. 4. Results: The experiments have been improved significantly splitting the section into two subsections and giving additional explanations. 5. Practicality and/or Research implications: The only practical implication this reviewer can see is the one derived from the importance of using middleware in the design of robot controllers; but I cannot see any specific implication derived from this paper. 6. Quality of Communication: The paper is written well and the readability is still good Reviewer: 2 Comments: The paper presents a middleware-based software structure for service robots. The proposed solution presents a multi-layered structure based on CORBA architecture and RTM (Robot Technology Middleware). The paper gives an overview of the software architecture and of the implemented software modules, and finally, experimental results with a service robot are provided to validate the approach. The paper is quite clear and easy to follow, and the proposed solution is interesting and well structured; the main questionable issues about the paper concern the fact the paper presents the developed software structure but it does not adequately address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field. For example, a part from describing the chosen software framework and the developed modules, the Authors should better explain what are the advantages of the proposed solution and what are the innovative components. Moreover, despite the software structure seems to be promising, the paper gives just an overview of the different modules; none of them is described in details and most of them seem just to implement standard solutions. Thus, the Authors should further explain the novelty the developed modules and provide more details to allow a proper evaluation of their characteristics. The experimental validation is quite weak and mainly left to few snapshots of the performed mission. The Auhtors should provide more analytical instruments to evaluate the system performance in order to properly validate its effectiveness. Additional Questions: 1. Originality: The paper presents a middleware-based software structure for service robots. The proposed solution presents a multi-layered structure based on CORBA architecture and RTM (Robot Technology Middleware). The paper gives an overview of the software architecture and of the implemented software modules, and finally, experimental results with a service robot are provided to validate the approach. The developed software seems well structured; however the Authors should further address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field. Indeed, despite the proposed architecture seems interesting, it is not clear what is the novelty of the software module, and what are the advantages of the chosen software platform with respect to other (e.g. middleware architectures based on ROS). 2. Relationship to Literature: As above, in the reviewer opinion the Authors should further address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field, and what are its advantages with respect to other platforms. 3. Methodology: The paper is quite clear and easy to be read; however it is quite descriptive and none of the software modules is described in details. This choice allows the reader to have a clear overview of the software structure but does not allow to appreciate in details the effectiveness of the proposed solution. 4. Results: The experimental validation should be further improved to give more analytical instruments to evaluate the system performances. 5. Practicality and/or Research implications: The proposed software seems an interesting solution for service robotics. 6. Quality of Communication: The paper is quite clear and easy to be read. 為了方便大家閱讀，我已經(jīng)加粗了部分我覺得重要的意見。希望小木蟲上的各位蟲友能給我提些意見啊，這里先謝謝大家了。 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2013-9-17 at 10:41 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
調(diào)劑申請(qǐng)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
環(huán)境工程297分求調(diào)劑一志愿杭高院
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
一志愿085600中科院寧波所276分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
288資源與環(huán)境專碩求調(diào)劑，不限專業(yè)，有學(xué)上就行
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
-
273求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
267求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
調(diào)劑推薦
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
324分 085600材料與化工
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- materials letters 投稿求助！關(guān)于論文字?jǐn)?shù)！有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的幫忙看下！
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 編輯說文章的外審專家不是不回復(fù)就是拒審，要退稿，怎么辦
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 求教各位蟲友，怎樣可以查詢一些對(duì)研究生開放的國(guó)際會(huì)議信息？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 求教：什么論文能獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)50萬元？
已經(jīng)有107人回復(fù)
- 關(guān)于論文字?jǐn)?shù)問題，向大家求教！
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 審稿人建議動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)，補(bǔ)不了，怎么委婉的回復(fù)呢
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 關(guān)于論文內(nèi)容重復(fù)及引用的問題，向大家求教！
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
- 論文出版費(fèi) 求教
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 小弟第一次投的《微電子學(xué)與計(jì)算機(jī)》，已經(jīng)審稿50天了，是不是被拒了？
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- 文章兩次外審后退稿修改，現(xiàn)在該怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 求教talanta雜志選編輯問題
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 求教大論文寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 文章修回了，但問題不知道怎么回答，求教��！
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 一篇英文文章連被拒了兩次，怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
- 各位蟲友們請(qǐng)幫幫忙啊，萬分感謝了�。。。�！
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 想寫論文，不知道該如何下手
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 求教引用次數(shù)查詢
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 求教投過Journal of Alloys and Compounds的蟲友們
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 求教各位我的chemistry letters 怎么回事啊
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
scortan
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 48 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2119.1
- 散金: 47
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 427
- 在線: 748.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1333977
- 注冊(cè): 2011-06-29
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝您的意見，可能我還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)，之前已經(jīng)明確了contribution了 2013-09-07 12:09:43
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:15
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝您的意見，可能我還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)，之前已經(jīng)明確了contribution了 2013-09-07 12:09:43
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:15
|
字很多，沒看完，大致意思看了 我覺得，論文第一要素還是創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)或者說自己的原創(chuàng)論點(diǎn)，自己寫完覺得能打動(dòng)自己，然后才有可能打動(dòng)審稿人，如果自己都覺得一般般，那么悲劇的可能性會(huì)非常大了。 樓主寫作能力算不錯(cuò)，看審稿人對(duì)寫作評(píng)語都不差，還是建議樓主在原有的基礎(chǔ)上深挖下看有沒有可能提一些新穎點(diǎn)的結(jié)論出來，這應(yīng)該有助于接收。 祝樓主下次好運(yùn) |
2樓2013-09-07 11:55:15
googleuboy
木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 747 (博后)
- 金幣: 3118.8
- 散金: 4149
- 紅花: 36
- 帖子: 6906
- 在線: 760.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1810740
- 注冊(cè): 2012-05-11
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 結(jié)構(gòu)工程
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助 2013-09-07 13:29:56
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:42
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助 2013-09-07 13:29:56
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:42
|
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in ***. We all appreciate your efforts to improve the paper however it is still weak and for any future papers you should be sure to highlight the original elements of your work. For a paper to be published in our journal it must add significantly to the body of existing work. I think you need to take your research further and deeper. 主編覺得你的文章達(dá)不到他們的要求。個(gè)人覺得：哪怕你“還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)”也沒什么希望的，因?yàn)槟阋鞔_創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)這不難修改，困難的是評(píng)委都覺得你的文章很粗糙，細(xì)節(jié)不夠（however it is quite descriptive and none of the software modules is described in details），創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)不夠（ should further explain the novelty the developed modules and provide more details to allow a proper evaluation of their characteristics. ）。 早點(diǎn)換期刊投吧。 |
6樓2013-09-07 12:38:23
Champion!!!
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 27 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2722.8
- 散金: 1477
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 712
- 在線: 378小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2595355
- 注冊(cè): 2013-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 微生物生理與生物化學(xué)
13樓2013-09-07 14:16:00
oio14644
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 227 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 1008.7
- 散金: 200
- 紅花: 20
- 帖子: 674
- 在線: 59.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2581217
- 注冊(cè): 2013-08-05
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
3樓2013-09-07 11:57:20
4樓2013-09-07 12:10:45
jinwei331
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 3742 (副教授)
- 金幣: 28683.7
- 紅花: 73
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 26959
- 在線: 1170.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2085922
- 注冊(cè): 2012-10-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)械測(cè)試?yán)碚撆c技術(shù)
5樓2013-09-07 12:20:47
jinkui960
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 1220 (講師)
- 金幣: 10246.5
- 散金: 1000
- 紅花: 42
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 5797
- 在線: 517.3小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1327313
- 注冊(cè): 2011-06-20
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 生物防治
7樓2013-09-07 12:47:27
huaxiduan
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 18 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 15470.9
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 12389
- 在線: 200.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 396692
- 注冊(cè): 2007-06-09
- 專業(yè): 幾何學(xué)
8樓2013-09-07 13:10:00
henrylc
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 590 (博士)
- 金幣: 1208.4
- 散金: 5142
- 紅花: 26
- 帖子: 988
- 在線: 329.8小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2126290
- 注冊(cè): 2012-11-14
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)械動(dòng)力學(xué)
9樓2013-09-07 13:15:02
10樓2013-09-07 13:31:18
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 880110sj 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程297分求調(diào)劑一志愿杭高院 +8 | GENJIOW 2026-03-31 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 0856材料與化工調(diào)劑，339 +8 | 10213207 2026-03-31 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 080200專業(yè)277分，求帶走！ +4 | 瓶子PZ 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +17 | 誰不是少年 2026-03-29 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +6 | akie... 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | 藍(lán)月亮亮 2026-03-30 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 不挑專業(yè) 求收留 +4 | Yam. 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 11ggg 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 福建理工大學(xué)材料學(xué)院先進(jìn)合金團(tuán)隊(duì)招收考研調(diào)劑學(xué)生 +3 | 大華金商都 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297 地理學(xué)070500 復(fù)試求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小圓圈圈ooo 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 085600求調(diào)劑 +7 | BBQ233 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +5 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 壓國(guó)家一區(qū)線，求導(dǎo)師收留，有恩必謝！ +7 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 求求讓我有書讀?/a> 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298調(diào)劑 +3 | jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|