 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 4061 | 回復: 53 | |||
880110sj兌換貴賓
|
[求助]
論文被拒兩次了，現(xiàn)在不知道怎么辦了，求教各位蟲友
|
||
|
論文第一次投是在今年5月份，后來7月份收到拒稿信，然后根據(jù)兩位審稿人的意見進行了大幅度的修改和增添內容（由原來的4000字左右增加到了6000多字），也增加了一個跟其他文獻的對比實驗；第二次是在8月8日投出去的，現(xiàn)在剛又收到拒稿信了。主要是說我文章的創(chuàng)新性和contribution不足，可是我在第一部分已經結論中都已經提到本文的contribution和創(chuàng)新性了啊。而且按照審稿意見，貌似審稿人希望的是系統(tǒng)中各個模塊都應該有創(chuàng)新性，可是一篇文章哪來那么多創(chuàng)新點啊？ 下面將審稿意見貼出來，大家?guī)臀铱纯聪乱徊皆撛趺崔k吧？這種情況下是不是申訴也意義不大了��？哎，論文從寫作到投稿再到修改，老板從來沒有過問過，想讓他幫我看看也沒有空的，就說先投出去看回來的審稿意見再修改好了，可是。。。做學生的哪里來的那么多時間和精力來回折騰啊  In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in ***. We all appreciate your efforts to improve the paper however it is still weak and for any future papers you should be sure to highlight the original elements of your work. For a paper to be published in our journal it must add significantly to the body of existing work. I think you need to take your research further and deeper. Reviewer: 1 Comments: 1. Originality: The authors have made a significant effort to improve the paper by amending the questions pointed out by this reviewer; nevertheless, the contribution is still weak. 2. Relationship to Literature: Yes, the authors seem to have a good knowledge about the related publications and they took into account the reviewer's suggestion of including and commenting the work from Smart (2007). 3. Methodology: Tables I to IV have been removed and the information included as text, which is an acceptable solution. Fig 12 (Fig 17 in the reviewed version) has been explained a little bit. However, the methodology remains as it was. 4. Results: The experiments have been improved significantly splitting the section into two subsections and giving additional explanations. 5. Practicality and/or Research implications: The only practical implication this reviewer can see is the one derived from the importance of using middleware in the design of robot controllers; but I cannot see any specific implication derived from this paper. 6. Quality of Communication: The paper is written well and the readability is still good Reviewer: 2 Comments: The paper presents a middleware-based software structure for service robots. The proposed solution presents a multi-layered structure based on CORBA architecture and RTM (Robot Technology Middleware). The paper gives an overview of the software architecture and of the implemented software modules, and finally, experimental results with a service robot are provided to validate the approach. The paper is quite clear and easy to follow, and the proposed solution is interesting and well structured; the main questionable issues about the paper concern the fact the paper presents the developed software structure but it does not adequately address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field. For example, a part from describing the chosen software framework and the developed modules, the Authors should better explain what are the advantages of the proposed solution and what are the innovative components. Moreover, despite the software structure seems to be promising, the paper gives just an overview of the different modules; none of them is described in details and most of them seem just to implement standard solutions. Thus, the Authors should further explain the novelty the developed modules and provide more details to allow a proper evaluation of their characteristics. The experimental validation is quite weak and mainly left to few snapshots of the performed mission. The Auhtors should provide more analytical instruments to evaluate the system performance in order to properly validate its effectiveness. Additional Questions: 1. Originality: The paper presents a middleware-based software structure for service robots. The proposed solution presents a multi-layered structure based on CORBA architecture and RTM (Robot Technology Middleware). The paper gives an overview of the software architecture and of the implemented software modules, and finally, experimental results with a service robot are provided to validate the approach. The developed software seems well structured; however the Authors should further address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field. Indeed, despite the proposed architecture seems interesting, it is not clear what is the novelty of the software module, and what are the advantages of the chosen software platform with respect to other (e.g. middleware architectures based on ROS). 2. Relationship to Literature: As above, in the reviewer opinion the Authors should further address the novelty of the proposed architecture with respect to the literature on the field, and what are its advantages with respect to other platforms. 3. Methodology: The paper is quite clear and easy to be read; however it is quite descriptive and none of the software modules is described in details. This choice allows the reader to have a clear overview of the software structure but does not allow to appreciate in details the effectiveness of the proposed solution. 4. Results: The experimental validation should be further improved to give more analytical instruments to evaluate the system performances. 5. Practicality and/or Research implications: The proposed software seems an interesting solution for service robotics. 6. Quality of Communication: The paper is quite clear and easy to be read. 為了方便大家閱讀，我已經加粗了部分我覺得重要的意見。希望小木蟲上的各位蟲友能給我提些意見啊，這里先謝謝大家了。 [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2013-9-17 at 10:41 ] |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
材料專碩306英一數(shù)二
已經有7人回復
-
求生物學調劑
已經有3人回復
-
材料科學與工程339求調劑
已經有10人回復
-
309求調劑
已經有10人回復
-
生物學 296 求調劑
已經有11人回復
-
321求調劑
已經有8人回復
-
一志愿鄭大085600，310分求調劑
已經有6人回復
-
295材料工程專碩求調劑
已經有11人回復
-
08工科275分求調劑
已經有9人回復
-
材料調劑
已經有12人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- materials letters 投稿求助！關于論文字數(shù)！有經驗的幫忙看下！
已經有9人回復
- 編輯說文章的外審專家不是不回復就是拒審，要退稿，怎么辦
已經有4人回復
- 求教各位蟲友，怎樣可以查詢一些對研究生開放的國際會議信息？
已經有4人回復
- 求教：什么論文能獎勵50萬元？
已經有107人回復
- 關于論文字數(shù)問題，向大家求教！
已經有8人回復
- 審稿人建議動物實驗，補不了，怎么委婉的回復呢
已經有5人回復
- 關于論文內容重復及引用的問題，向大家求教！
已經有21人回復
- 論文出版費 求教
已經有9人回復
- 小弟第一次投的《微電子學與計算機》，已經審稿50天了，是不是被拒了？
已經有23人回復
- 文章兩次外審后退稿修改，現(xiàn)在該怎么辦？
已經有13人回復
- 求教talanta雜志選編輯問題
已經有3人回復
- 求教大論文寫作經驗
已經有7人回復
- 文章修回了，但問題不知道怎么回答，求教��！
已經有3人回復
- 一篇英文文章連被拒了兩次，怎么辦？
已經有41人回復
- 各位蟲友們請幫幫忙啊，萬分感謝了�。。。�！
已經有13人回復
- 想寫論文，不知道該如何下手
已經有6人回復
- 求教引用次數(shù)查詢
已經有3人回復
- 求教投過Journal of Alloys and Compounds的蟲友們
已經有6人回復
- 求教各位我的chemistry letters 怎么回事啊
已經有3人回復
scortan
專家顧問
- 應助: 48 (小學生)
- 金幣: 2125.4
- 散金: 47
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 432
- 在線: 752.3小時
- 蟲號: 1333977
- 注冊: 2011-06-29
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
【答案】應助回帖
★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝您的意見，可能我還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點，之前已經明確了contribution了 2013-09-07 12:09:43
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:15
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝您的意見，可能我還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點，之前已經明確了contribution了 2013-09-07 12:09:43
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:15
|
字很多，沒看完，大致意思看了 我覺得，論文第一要素還是創(chuàng)新點或者說自己的原創(chuàng)論點，自己寫完覺得能打動自己，然后才有可能打動審稿人，如果自己都覺得一般般，那么悲劇的可能性會非常大了。 樓主寫作能力算不錯，看審稿人對寫作評語都不差，還是建議樓主在原有的基礎上深挖下看有沒有可能提一些新穎點的結論出來，這應該有助于接收。 祝樓主下次好運 |
2樓2013-09-07 11:55:15
oio14644
實習版主
- 應助: 227 (大學生)
- 金幣: 1008.7
- 散金: 200
- 紅花: 20
- 帖子: 674
- 在線: 59.6小時
- 蟲號: 2581217
- 注冊: 2013-08-05
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
3樓2013-09-07 11:57:20
880110sj
專家顧問
- 應助: 26 (小學生)
- 金幣: 389.9
- 散金: 1774
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 773
- 在線: 323.6小時
- 蟲號: 1239502
- 注冊: 2011-03-20
- 專業(yè): 機構學與機器人
4樓2013-09-07 12:10:45
jinwei331
超級版主
- 應助: 3742 (副教授)
- 金幣: 28683.7
- 紅花: 73
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 26959
- 在線: 1170.4小時
- 蟲號: 2085922
- 注冊: 2012-10-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機械測試理論與技術
5樓2013-09-07 12:20:47
googleuboy
兌換貴賓
- 應助: 747 (博后)
- 金幣: 3118.8
- 散金: 4149
- 紅花: 36
- 帖子: 6906
- 在線: 760.6小時
- 蟲號: 1810740
- 注冊: 2012-05-11
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 結構工程
【答案】應助回帖
★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助 2013-09-07 13:29:56
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:42
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
880110sj: 金幣+3, ★★★很有幫助 2013-09-07 13:29:56
880110sj: 回帖置頂 2013-09-09 07:28:42
|
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in ***. We all appreciate your efforts to improve the paper however it is still weak and for any future papers you should be sure to highlight the original elements of your work. For a paper to be published in our journal it must add significantly to the body of existing work. I think you need to take your research further and deeper. 主編覺得你的文章達不到他們的要求。個人覺得：哪怕你“還得要在論文中明確創(chuàng)新點”也沒什么希望的，因為你要明確創(chuàng)新點這不難修改，困難的是評委都覺得你的文章很粗糙，細節(jié)不夠（however it is quite descriptive and none of the software modules is described in details），創(chuàng)新點不夠（ should further explain the novelty the developed modules and provide more details to allow a proper evaluation of their characteristics. ）。 早點換期刊投吧。 |
6樓2013-09-07 12:38:23
jinkui960
管理員
- 應助: 1220 (講師)
- 金幣: 10246.5
- 散金: 1000
- 紅花: 42
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 5797
- 在線: 517.3小時
- 蟲號: 1327313
- 注冊: 2011-06-20
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 生物防治
7樓2013-09-07 12:47:27
huaxiduan
版主
- 應助: 18 (小學生)
- 金幣: 15470.9
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 12389
- 在線: 200.9小時
- 蟲號: 396692
- 注冊: 2007-06-09
- 專業(yè): 幾何學
8樓2013-09-07 13:10:00
henrylc
超級版主
- 應助: 590 (博士)
- 金幣: 1208.4
- 散金: 5142
- 紅花: 26
- 帖子: 988
- 在線: 329.8小時
- 蟲號: 2126290
- 注冊: 2012-11-14
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機械動力學
9樓2013-09-07 13:15:02
880110sj
超級版主
- 應助: 26 (小學生)
- 金幣: 389.9
- 散金: 1774
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 773
- 在線: 323.6小時
- 蟲號: 1239502
- 注冊: 2011-03-20
- 專業(yè): 機構學與機器人
10樓2013-09-07 13:31:18
相關版塊跳轉
我要訂閱樓主 880110sj 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 309求調劑 +8 | gajsj 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料調劑 +3 | 一樣YWY 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北交材料工程總分358 +5 | cs0106 2026-04-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物與醫(yī)藥考研調劑 +3 | 鐵憨憨123425 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 349求調劑 +6 | zwjjjjjj 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[電化學] 070300化學調劑 +7 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 375求調劑 +7 | 雨夏整夜 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 學碩274求調劑 +17 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研] 354求調劑 +3 | lxb598 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西電085401數(shù)一英一299求調劑 六級521 +4 | 愛吃大鴨梨 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602化工求調劑（331分） +8 | 111@127 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +10 | 家佳佳佳佳佳 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調劑 +13 | 是妍子也是研子 2026-03-30 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學0703總分337求調劑 +6 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【求調劑】085601材料工程專碩 | 總分272 | +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調劑 +5 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856求調劑 +13 | zhn03 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學碩導招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調劑 +6 | wasdssaa 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學碩求調劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|