| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1620 | 回復(fù): 4 | ||
feixiang113銀蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
這樣的情況能申訴嗎?
|
|
我這樣的審稿意見,可以考慮申訴嗎?因?yàn)槭潜绢I(lǐng)域比較強(qiáng)的期刊,但是意見總覺得憋屈。要不要申訴啊,還是改投啊,哎,我覺得2個審稿人都沒有特別重大的意見,其中第一個審稿意見還行,關(guān)鍵是第二審稿人給了拒稿,原因就是認(rèn)為和2篇文獻(xiàn)工作有重疊,其中一篇肯定沒重疊,另一個篇是有重疊的內(nèi)容,但是那些都是做這個領(lǐng)域必須考慮的影響因素啊,每個人都會重復(fù)咯,如果不做這些就不對了哦,我懷疑第二個審稿人不會就是那篇文章作者吧,此外第二審稿人提供的其他詳細(xì)問題都看起來不是文章的重點(diǎn),也和那2篇重復(fù)的文獻(xiàn)觀點(diǎn)不一致呢。 Editor: According to the policy of WR editorial board and the reviewers' serious/critical comments, this manuscript should not be considered for publication in Water Research. The Reviewer #1 shows possible publication after revision. However, Reviewer #2 pointed out serious drawbacks for publication in WR and proposes rejection. I agree the judgment of the Reviewer #2. Reviewer #2 also pointed out overlapping with previous studies without explanation of originality of this paper and weakness in explanation in experiments and data discussion. In addition, Reviewer #1 pointed out paper redundancy and provided fundamental questions, which means that paper does not describe research content properly. Reviewer #1: This paper described characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotubes which can adsorb tetracycline. Experiments were conducted very well and the paper was written well. This technology must be applied to real water treatment process in the near future. Throughout the paper, the text is redundant. It should be condensed. Introduction It is unclear where this technology will be applied. Line 79-81 Please indicate why you have to investigate "the adsorption behavior of antibiotics on CNTs having different oxygen contents and the antibiotic adsorption capacity of CNTs". Line 72-88 I wonder why you separate effect of oxygen from other parameters. Line 86-88 It's may be better to revise such that various parameters are adsorption time, solution pH, ionic strength and humic acid and Cu2+ were used for comparative work. Line 100 What is BET? Figure 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c) should be combined. Figure S1 may be included in the paper. Reviewer #2: General comments The research paper "***" by* deal with the adsorption of antibiotics onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the batch experiments. Although studying the effect of MWCNT properties on the tetracycline (TC) adsorption is interesting and falls within the scope of the journal, the present paper is highly overlapped with previous studies such as Ji et al., 2010b and Zhang et al., 2011b. In addition, there are many points where explanation is not enough such as experimental conditions. More detailed comments are provided below following sentences. Specific comments 1. Page 3, Line 54: The authors should address "TC has become a serious problem" as well, and it may be appropriate to include references regarding this issue. 2. Page 4, Lines 73-75: The authors should address the differences in the objectives and results between reference (Zhang et al., 2011b) and present paper more clearly. 3. Page 5, Lines 91-97: How did you obtain raw materials and reagents to prepare MWCNTs used in the present paper? Please give detailed information about materials and methods so it can be repeated by other researchers. 4. Page 5, Lines 100-102: The authors should provide the measurement procedure of the BET surface area and the particle sizes/outer diameters for MWCNTs used in the present paper. 5. Page 5, Lines 104-105: Why did you select 20 mg/40 mL of MWCNT dosage? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point. 6. Page 5, Lines 106-107: Why did you select 7.3-151.6 mg/L of TC concentrations? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point. 7. Page 6, Lines 120-123: Initial TC concentrations between two experiments designed to investigate the effects of pH and ionic strength on TC removal by MWCNTs were different in the present paper. The authors should describe the reason why the initial TC concentrations were different between two experiments, and should address the effect of initial TC concentration on TC removal. 8. Page 9, Lines 181-182: The authors should address the differences in the results between reference (Ji et al., 2010b) and present paper more clearly. 9. Page 10, Lines 201-202: The authors should provide the analytical results of hydrophilicity and dispersibility of MWCNTs for further discussion. 10. Page 10, Lines 213-214: Is "CNTs-2.0%O" mistyping? It is not clear to the reviewer why "CNTs-2.0%O" appear twice in this sentence. 11. Page 16, Line 331: Why did you select pH 5 to investigate the effect of Cu2+ on TC adsorption? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point, and should address the effect of pH in this experiment. 12. Pages 16-17, Lines 341-354: The experimental data regarding effect of ionic strength is missing in the Figure 6. 13. Page 17, Line 360: Why did you select pH 5 to investigate the effect of humic acid on TC adsorption? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point, and should address the effect of pH in this experiment. 14. Pages 25-35: The authors should provide captions for all tables and figures. |
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
Ph.D.

木蟲 (知名作家)

| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 石河子大學(xué)(211、雙一流)碩博研究生長期招生公告 +3 | 李子目 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語六級551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +6 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +12 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 291 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 化工2026屆畢業(yè)?/a> 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 沿岸有貝殼6 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286分人工智能專業(yè)請求調(diào)劑愿意跨考! +4 | lemonzzn 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | 某某某某位 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 083200學(xué)碩321分一志愿暨南大學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | innocenceF 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ,070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境專碩,總分308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姐阿姐家啊 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 司空. 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +7 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調(diào)劑南林,給自己招師弟中~ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|