 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1622 | 回復(fù): 4 | ||
feixiang113銀蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
這樣的情況能申訴嗎？
|
|
我這樣的審稿意見，可以考慮申訴嗎？因?yàn)槭潜绢I(lǐng)域比較強(qiáng)的期刊，但是意見總覺得憋屈。要不要申訴啊，還是改投啊，哎，我覺得2個(gè)審稿人都沒有特別重大的意見，其中第一個(gè)審稿意見還行，關(guān)鍵是第二審稿人給了拒稿，原因就是認(rèn)為和2篇文獻(xiàn)工作有重疊，其中一篇肯定沒重疊，另一個(gè)篇是有重疊的內(nèi)容，但是那些都是做這個(gè)領(lǐng)域必須考慮的影響因素啊，每個(gè)人都會(huì)重復(fù)咯，如果不做這些就不對(duì)了哦，我懷疑第二個(gè)審稿人不會(huì)就是那篇文章作者吧，此外第二審稿人提供的其他詳細(xì)問題都看起來不是文章的重點(diǎn)，也和那2篇重復(fù)的文獻(xiàn)觀點(diǎn)不一致呢。 Editor: According to the policy of WR editorial board and the reviewers' serious/critical comments, this manuscript should not be considered for publication in Water Research. The Reviewer #1 shows possible publication after revision. However, Reviewer #2 pointed out serious drawbacks for publication in WR and proposes rejection. I agree the judgment of the Reviewer #2. Reviewer #2 also pointed out overlapping with previous studies without explanation of originality of this paper and weakness in explanation in experiments and data discussion. In addition, Reviewer #1 pointed out paper redundancy and provided fundamental questions, which means that paper does not describe research content properly. Reviewer #1: This paper described characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotubes which can adsorb tetracycline. Experiments were conducted very well and the paper was written well. This technology must be applied to real water treatment process in the near future. Throughout the paper, the text is redundant. It should be condensed. Introduction It is unclear where this technology will be applied. Line 79-81 Please indicate why you have to investigate "the adsorption behavior of antibiotics on CNTs having different oxygen contents and the antibiotic adsorption capacity of CNTs". Line 72-88 I wonder why you separate effect of oxygen from other parameters. Line 86-88 It's may be better to revise such that various parameters are adsorption time, solution pH, ionic strength and humic acid and Cu2+ were used for comparative work. Line 100 What is BET? Figure 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c) should be combined. Figure S1 may be included in the paper. Reviewer #2: General comments The research paper "***" by* deal with the adsorption of antibiotics onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the batch experiments. Although studying the effect of MWCNT properties on the tetracycline (TC) adsorption is interesting and falls within the scope of the journal, the present paper is highly overlapped with previous studies such as Ji et al., 2010b and Zhang et al., 2011b. In addition, there are many points where explanation is not enough such as experimental conditions. More detailed comments are provided below following sentences. Specific comments 1. Page 3, Line 54: The authors should address "TC has become a serious problem" as well, and it may be appropriate to include references regarding this issue. 2. Page 4, Lines 73-75: The authors should address the differences in the objectives and results between reference (Zhang et al., 2011b) and present paper more clearly. 3. Page 5, Lines 91-97: How did you obtain raw materials and reagents to prepare MWCNTs used in the present paper? Please give detailed information about materials and methods so it can be repeated by other researchers. 4. Page 5, Lines 100-102: The authors should provide the measurement procedure of the BET surface area and the particle sizes/outer diameters for MWCNTs used in the present paper. 5. Page 5, Lines 104-105: Why did you select 20 mg/40 mL of MWCNT dosage? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point. 6. Page 5, Lines 106-107: Why did you select 7.3-151.6 mg/L of TC concentrations? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point. 7. Page 6, Lines 120-123: Initial TC concentrations between two experiments designed to investigate the effects of pH and ionic strength on TC removal by MWCNTs were different in the present paper. The authors should describe the reason why the initial TC concentrations were different between two experiments, and should address the effect of initial TC concentration on TC removal. 8. Page 9, Lines 181-182: The authors should address the differences in the results between reference (Ji et al., 2010b) and present paper more clearly. 9. Page 10, Lines 201-202: The authors should provide the analytical results of hydrophilicity and dispersibility of MWCNTs for further discussion. 10. Page 10, Lines 213-214: Is "CNTs-2.0%O" mistyping? It is not clear to the reviewer why "CNTs-2.0%O" appear twice in this sentence. 11. Page 16, Line 331: Why did you select pH 5 to investigate the effect of Cu2+ on TC adsorption? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point, and should address the effect of pH in this experiment. 12. Pages 16-17, Lines 341-354: The experimental data regarding effect of ionic strength is missing in the Figure 6. 13. Page 17, Line 360: Why did you select pH 5 to investigate the effect of humic acid on TC adsorption? The authors should describe the reason regarding this point, and should address the effect of pH in this experiment. 14. Pages 25-35: The authors should provide captions for all tables and figures. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
323求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京化工大學(xué) 070300 學(xué)碩 336分 求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
352求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿東華大學(xué)化學(xué)070300，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
277材料科學(xué)與工程080500求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
317求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
-
293求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
280分求調(diào)劑 一志愿085802
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
0854電子信息求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
263求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 被編輯冤枉的判一稿多投
已經(jīng)有74人回復(fù)
- 論文兩個(gè)審稿人讓小修，一個(gè)審稿人拒絕，結(jié)果編輯拒稿了，這種情況還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
- 大家遇到過這種情況嗎 Manuscript Accepted 后被拒
已經(jīng)有35人回復(fù)
- 畢業(yè)論文查重問題
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- OE（optics express）這樣的審稿意見還有改的必要嗎？
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)兔纯�，這種情況如何回復(fù)編輯及申訴
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 投ACS下的一個(gè)期刊，新年第一天就悲劇了，這種情況要不要申訴下
已經(jīng)有55人回復(fù)
- 求助：如何給英文編輯公司的編輯寫申訴信
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 這種情況下可以申訴么？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 投稿Langmuir，審稿人都說可以發(fā)表，編輯拒稿，這種情況有必要申訴嗎？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 投《稀有金屬材料與工程》被拒稿，申訴，結(jié)果編輯說又送外審了，這是什么意思?
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 兩個(gè)大修，一個(gè)小修，希望大嗎？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- catalysis letter 拒稿后能申訴么？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 投稿Biomacromolecules被拒，這種情況還有必要申訴嗎。。。
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 編輯在什么情況下會(huì)選用自己推薦的審稿人
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 被J.Phys.Chem C拒了，2個(gè)審稿人意見差別很大，遇到這種情況我該咋辦
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 初審沒過，有沒有人申訴成功過？
已經(jīng)有58人回復(fù)
- 這種情況可以申請(qǐng)更換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
zh10246
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 348 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 13498.5
- 散金: 115
- 紅花: 47
- 帖子: 14590
- 在線: 879.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2786456
- 注冊(cè): 2013-11-08
- 專業(yè): 細(xì)胞外基質(zhì)
2樓2013-11-25 17:08:25
3樓2013-11-25 17:16:34
wangdj
木蟲 (正式寫手)
Ph.D.
- 應(yīng)助: 43 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 3980.4
- 散金: 303
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 351
- 在線: 157.8小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 803373
- 注冊(cè): 2009-07-04
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境污染化學(xué)
4樓2013-11-25 17:21:57
googleuboy
木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 747 (博后)
- 金幣: 3118.8
- 散金: 4149
- 紅花: 36
- 帖子: 6906
- 在線: 760.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1810740
- 注冊(cè): 2012-05-11
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 結(jié)構(gòu)工程
5樓2013-11-25 17:24:12
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 feixiang113 的主題更新
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +12 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 18/900 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 280分求調(diào)劑 一志愿085802 +4 | PUMPT 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大，0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分，有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目，四級(jí)已過 +6 | 幸運(yùn)哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +5 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學(xué)（0703）總分337求調(diào)劑 +9 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 269專碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 金恩貝 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求助 +5 | 夢(mèng)里的無言 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 余意卿 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +3 | 鳳凰院丁真 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山大07化學(xué) 332分 四六級(jí)已過 本科山東雙非 求調(diào)劑！ +3 | 不想理你 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)（081702）315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +6 | hanamiko 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408 344分 求調(diào)劑 一志愿 華電計(jì)算機(jī)技術(shù) +4 | solanXXX 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑211或者雙一流 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086500 325 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 領(lǐng)帶小熊 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +7 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數(shù)二 +10 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|