| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1918 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
dongyifeia銀蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
比較奇怪的拒稿信,發(fā)出來(lái)給大家看看! 已有5人參與
|
|
一篇自我感覺(jué)良好的文章發(fā)到CBP,Part C,1月27投稿,一直沒(méi)收到任何郵件,昨天發(fā)信催稿,得到如下回復(fù): Dear Dr. X Thanks for your letter. I've checked your file and you were sent a decision letter from the editor on February 18, 2014. I'm sorry if for some reason you did not receive this. I've copied it below for you. Kind regards, Marlene From:Martin Grosell <cbpcmartin@gmail.com> To:"Dong X" <X@163.com> Cc: Bcc: Subject: Decision on CBP ms.23241 Dear Dr. X: Thank you for submitting your manuscript “Disruption of the XXXX” for consideration for publication in CBP. We regret to have to inform you that the editors, after consultation with members of the CBP Editorial Board and after contacting potential external reviewers, have decided not to pursue external review of your manuscript any further and to close the file. Unfortunately, after contacting numerous experts in the field, there was not a single one willing to accept the referee assignment. We have taken these responses as a lack of enthusiasm for the fit of your paper to the readership of CBP. We carefully choose reviewers for their expertise and their interests and involvement in comparative fields. The reviewers’ disappointing lack of interest in your manuscript is a reasonable indication that you would be missing the intended target audience by pursuing publication of this particular study in CBP. Finally, please note that CBP receives many more high quality submissions than we could possibly handle (or publish) and therefore, we have to take a relatively hard line on manuscripts that are deemed of peripheral interest to our readership or represent an incremental advance in knowledge only, at least within a comparative framework. Our decision does neither reflect on the quality of the research reported, nor on the quality of the issues addressed. We regret to have to convey this disappointing message, but we are positive that you will find a more appreciative reviewing climate and readership in a more specialist journal. Thank you for considering CBP. Best wishes, Dr. Tom Mommsen & Dr. Pat J. Walsh Editors-in-Chief Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 我個(gè)人感覺(jué)這意思就是文章水平不咋地,我們沒(méi)興趣,不想浪費(fèi)時(shí)間,各位蟲(chóng)友覺(jué)得呢? |
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
尋找陽(yáng)光

捐助貴賓 (著名寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
順其自然
|
你怎么找到的主編郵箱,我投的D的,一直不回復(fù),我也找不到郵箱地址問(wèn)問(wèn) 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶端 |

銀蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +6 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑 +6 | zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 梁成偉老師課題組歡迎你的加入 +8 | 一鴨鴨喲 2026-03-14 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專(zhuān)碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085600調(diào)劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢(mèng)微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料與化工319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專(zhuān)碩319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 297一志愿上交085600求調(diào)劑 +5 | 指尖八千里 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專(zhuān)家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211化學(xué)學(xué)碩310分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 程雨杭 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277求調(diào)劑 +4 | anchor17 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)考研312分調(diào)劑 +3 | T123 tt 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|