| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1931 | 回復: 5 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
dongyifeia銀蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
比較奇怪的拒稿信,發(fā)出來給大家看看! 已有5人參與
|
||
|
一篇自我感覺良好的文章發(fā)到CBP,Part C,1月27投稿,一直沒收到任何郵件,昨天發(fā)信催稿,得到如下回復: Dear Dr. X Thanks for your letter. I've checked your file and you were sent a decision letter from the editor on February 18, 2014. I'm sorry if for some reason you did not receive this. I've copied it below for you. Kind regards, Marlene From:Martin Grosell <cbpcmartin@gmail.com> To:"Dong X" <X@163.com> Cc: Bcc: Subject: Decision on CBP ms.23241 Dear Dr. X: Thank you for submitting your manuscript “Disruption of the XXXX” for consideration for publication in CBP. We regret to have to inform you that the editors, after consultation with members of the CBP Editorial Board and after contacting potential external reviewers, have decided not to pursue external review of your manuscript any further and to close the file. Unfortunately, after contacting numerous experts in the field, there was not a single one willing to accept the referee assignment. We have taken these responses as a lack of enthusiasm for the fit of your paper to the readership of CBP. We carefully choose reviewers for their expertise and their interests and involvement in comparative fields. The reviewers’ disappointing lack of interest in your manuscript is a reasonable indication that you would be missing the intended target audience by pursuing publication of this particular study in CBP. Finally, please note that CBP receives many more high quality submissions than we could possibly handle (or publish) and therefore, we have to take a relatively hard line on manuscripts that are deemed of peripheral interest to our readership or represent an incremental advance in knowledge only, at least within a comparative framework. Our decision does neither reflect on the quality of the research reported, nor on the quality of the issues addressed. We regret to have to convey this disappointing message, but we are positive that you will find a more appreciative reviewing climate and readership in a more specialist journal. Thank you for considering CBP. Best wishes, Dr. Tom Mommsen & Dr. Pat J. Walsh Editors-in-Chief Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 我個人感覺這意思就是文章水平不咋地,我們沒興趣,不想浪費時間,各位蟲友覺得呢? |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
順其自然

木蟲 (正式寫手)
尋找陽光

捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北交大材料工程總分358 +3 | cs0106 2026-04-02 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 319求調(diào)劑 +12 | 太容易1018 2026-04-01 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +23 | 新時代材料 2026-03-27 | 26/1300 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +11 | 1xiaojun23 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑0702 +3 | 梅子味晚霞 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 367求調(diào)劑 +8 | 芋泥啵! 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +12 | 一樣YWY 2026-04-01 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 求生物學調(diào)劑 +8 | 15172915737 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程調(diào)劑 +9 | hyzzzzzzz. 2026-04-01 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調(diào)劑 +9 | 勵志一定發(fā)文章 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 安徽大學專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分,英語已過四六級,六級521,求調(diào)劑 +10 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學有機化學專業(yè),初試351分,復試被刷求調(diào)劑! +9 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +10 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學354求調(diào)劑 +15 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +4 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 11408總分309,一志愿東南大學求調(diào)劑,不挑專業(yè) +5 | 天賦帶到THU 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +6 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求收留 +7 | 果然有我 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂樂樂 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|