| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1926 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
dongyifeia銀蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
比較奇怪的拒稿信,發(fā)出來給大家看看! 已有5人參與
|
||
|
一篇自我感覺良好的文章發(fā)到CBP,Part C,1月27投稿,一直沒收到任何郵件,昨天發(fā)信催稿,得到如下回復(fù): Dear Dr. X Thanks for your letter. I've checked your file and you were sent a decision letter from the editor on February 18, 2014. I'm sorry if for some reason you did not receive this. I've copied it below for you. Kind regards, Marlene From:Martin Grosell <cbpcmartin@gmail.com> To:"Dong X" <X@163.com> Cc: Bcc: Subject: Decision on CBP ms.23241 Dear Dr. X: Thank you for submitting your manuscript “Disruption of the XXXX” for consideration for publication in CBP. We regret to have to inform you that the editors, after consultation with members of the CBP Editorial Board and after contacting potential external reviewers, have decided not to pursue external review of your manuscript any further and to close the file. Unfortunately, after contacting numerous experts in the field, there was not a single one willing to accept the referee assignment. We have taken these responses as a lack of enthusiasm for the fit of your paper to the readership of CBP. We carefully choose reviewers for their expertise and their interests and involvement in comparative fields. The reviewers’ disappointing lack of interest in your manuscript is a reasonable indication that you would be missing the intended target audience by pursuing publication of this particular study in CBP. Finally, please note that CBP receives many more high quality submissions than we could possibly handle (or publish) and therefore, we have to take a relatively hard line on manuscripts that are deemed of peripheral interest to our readership or represent an incremental advance in knowledge only, at least within a comparative framework. Our decision does neither reflect on the quality of the research reported, nor on the quality of the issues addressed. We regret to have to convey this disappointing message, but we are positive that you will find a more appreciative reviewing climate and readership in a more specialist journal. Thank you for considering CBP. Best wishes, Dr. Tom Mommsen & Dr. Pat J. Walsh Editors-in-Chief Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 我個人感覺這意思就是文章水平不咋地,我們沒興趣,不想浪費時間,各位蟲友覺得呢? |
捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
尋找陽光

木蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
順其自然

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化學0703 調(diào)劑 306分 一志愿211 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | QiMing7 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 爭取九點睡 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +6 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856,材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +12 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +6 | 宋明欣 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | wasdssaa 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 325求調(diào)劑 +3 | Aoyijiang 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學/生化與分子/生物信息學相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂樂樂 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥292求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小小陳小小 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 291 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 化工2026屆畢業(yè)?/a> 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|