| 查看: 1860 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
oceanlike木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
審稿意見分析與修改 已有2人參與
|
|
ROCK MECH ROCK ENG審稿意見回來了,審稿人總體評價還好,但提出了6條具體意見,主編給了大修。前3條意見關(guān)于語言問題,很好解決。后面3條(如下),貌似有點(diǎn)復(fù)雜;請大家出出主意。 This is indeed a very interesting work and is worthwhile to be published after revision. Such a large scale field test data are rare and would be very useful for other researchers working in this area. 4. The comments in the abstract are a little naive, i.e. "The central part ….., similar to a ^^^. That is why ….. study site." In my opinion ... layers; it is wrong to draw an analogy with the ^^^. 5. Section 3.2 - This section is very important as it contains the actual filed test data analysis. I suggest that the authors devote considerable time to expand and make this section clearer; I had difficulty following the text precisely. Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 4 needs to be explained clearly. 6. I could not follow the significance of Section 4.2.3 specifically Figure 5. I suggest the authors make this section short and concentrate their effort in explaining Figures 5 and 6. 4. 意見是說,我在摘要中不能做出^^^這樣的類比嗎?事實(shí)上,我論文中Section 5討論作用原理,用了^^^來做類比,并且分析了我的實(shí)測結(jié)果與^^^的相似性。但審稿人不認(rèn)可,并提出了自己的見解。對于他指出的那句話,不僅在摘要中有這一句,在Section 5和結(jié)論中都有, 是不是說我這一部分要重新討論,還是說我僅僅把類似相關(guān)的這些話刪掉就行了? 5. 審稿人建議作者花更多精力擴(kuò)充3.2節(jié),并把這一部分寫清楚;目前的內(nèi)容審稿人不能很好地理解。表1和2,圖4需要解釋清楚。 他這是說我對數(shù)據(jù)的分析不夠嗎?我Section 3 就是Results,呈現(xiàn)的就是實(shí)測結(jié)果數(shù)據(jù),具體的分析和討論我已經(jīng)放到Section 4里面了。該怎么破?是否需要把Section 4的一部分調(diào)過來? 6. 是說審稿人認(rèn)為Section 4.2.3節(jié)不重要,尤其是圖5;建議作者把主要精力集中在解釋圖5和6上來。看了這條意見,我再讀論文,發(fā)現(xiàn)確實(shí)討論有內(nèi)容有點(diǎn)散,可以刪除那些與圖5和6不相關(guān)的內(nèi)容。問題是我還要再對圖5和圖6再做分析嗎?我認(rèn)為解釋清楚了啊。怎么破? 請大家多多提出寶貴意見。 |
版主 (職業(yè)作家)
努力的蟲子
|
對于5:表1和表2分析不夠深入,需要補(bǔ)充,具體分析放在section4,你可以解釋,不一定調(diào)換布局 對于6:與文章不是很緊密,可以刪掉的部分盡量刪掉,這樣顯得文章凝練,不松散。 祝樓主文章早日接受。 |
|
3。 [ 發(fā)自小木蟲客戶端 ] |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
This is indeed a very interesting work and is worthwhile to be published after revision. Such a large scale field test data are rare and would be very useful for other researchers working in this area. 就憑這句話就必須中啊。 小弟也投了一個RMRE,雖然意見偏正面,不過遠(yuǎn)沒有這么高的評價。修改中,希望修改稿也能如樓主般得到審稿專家的肯定。 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +8 | 負(fù)心者當(dāng)誅 2026-03-11 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[文學(xué)芳草園] 伙伴們,祝我生日快樂吧 +17 | myrtle 2026-03-10 | 26/1300 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[教師之家] 焦慮 +7 | 水冰月月野兔 2026-03-13 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 080500,材料學(xué)碩302分求調(diào)劑學(xué)校 +4 | 初識可樂 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 297一志愿上交085600求調(diào)劑 +5 | 指尖八千里 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +4 | 威化餅07 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)員97LZgn 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料371求調(diào)劑 +9 | 鱷魚? 2026-03-11 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑一志愿 985 總分 295 +8 | dream…… 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +5 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +3 | miaodesi 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600調(diào)劑求老師收留 +9 | jiaanl 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +7 | 綠豆芹菜湯 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | ADT 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | 柯淮然 2026-03-10 | 8/400 |
|