 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5072 | 回復(fù): 25 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
dxhit銀蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
文章重投又被拒，好像還是被同一個人拒，請大家給點意見 已有16人參與
|
|
|
第一次投的JOPT，兩個審稿人，一個審稿人的意見很積極，而另外一個審稿人意見非�？瘫�，簡單的說就是文章沒有新意，而且錯誤很多，拒稿，下面附上這個人的審稿意見 This manuscript does not present any new method to optimize design the MLDOE, and which only contribution may be in calculate process. About this point, the manuscript does not give out properly results. And there are several statements not appropriate and even some flaws. For these reasons this manuscript do not published on this Journal. The following are the questions and some mistakes in this manuscript: 1. The paper describes a calculated process to calculate the optimal surface relief height of MLDOEs directly, but this calculated process does not give out excited results, because the essence is to take the partial derivatives of fig. 2 in reference [6]. It is no different about how get the maximum point through partial derivatives or read directly. （確實是用了相同的目標函數(shù)，但我們直接推導(dǎo)了最優(yōu)高度的解析解，不在需要迭代或枚舉優(yōu)化） 2. The analysis about the materials selection, fabrication tolerance sensitivity, influence of environmental temperature and angle of incidence almost had been published. This manuscript does not give out best conclusion, because the discussion about the fabrication tolerances is less rigorous, and the results are more approximate than the results of the existing methods.（完全沒看懂我們的文章，我們分析的是為了獲得最高、最穩(wěn)定的衍射效率，如何選材，不知道怎么就扯到了他提到的分析，而且是已經(jīng)做過的） Above all, there are many mistakes in the manuscript and the results don't show good and good results. So I do not find that the manuscript give out good results. So I think that this manuscript is not suitable for publication on this journal. 在被拒后，對第二個人的意見很無語，但是我們還是很認真的分析了我們的文章，強調(diào)了我們的方法與原來方法的區(qū)別，并且對文章結(jié)構(gòu)也做了很大的修改，第一個審稿人的意見當然也全數(shù)消化。 改好后投又投了OA。還是兩審稿人，一個審稿人很快就完成了評審，覺得文章不錯，“ I believe that this manuscript is appropriate for Applied Optics. ”；另外一個審稿人，先是要求更多的評閱時間，然后給出了拒稿的意見，從審稿意見上看，這與上次是同一個人，因為說的話幾乎完全相同，下面是那個人的審稿意見 This manuscript does not present any new method to optimize the MLDOE, and which only contribution may be in calculations. And the calculated results may be no true with compared to the method in the reference[6], because the results in this manuscript was calculated from the approximate method can be seen from Eq [6], meanwhile, this method is confused for readers and engineers, because the calculative method are more complex and many approximate process. There are several statements not appropriate andeven some flaws. For these reasons, the constant of this manuscript do not appropriate to publish on this journal. The followings are questions and some mistakes in this manuscript: 1. On page 2, there are some inappropriate expression and conspicuous mistake in formula (3), (6) and (7). This calculated process does not give out excited results, and become more complex. （我們的方法確實有近似，但是文章說的很清楚，近似是合理的，而且確切的說是準確的，對比計算也證明了，而且公式哪有錯�。客耆珱]錯好不.....然后我們的方法直接就可以計算得到最優(yōu)結(jié)果，他卻說相比于枚舉優(yōu)化計算更加復(fù)雜......） 2. In part 4, this manuscript proposed some different guidelines of material selection. But those calculate depends on the infrared fields which materials refractive index and Abbe number change a lot on a different band. It is not appropriate to use a whole wave band to replace that. This is why we usually design an infrared optical element in 3-5 and 8-12um waveband rather than 3-12um. Besides it is also led to the linearity of the refractive index difference discuss. Above all, I think that the constant of this manuscript is not suitable for publication on this journal. （說我們得出的結(jié)論只是適合紅外領(lǐng)域。。這也是問題，文中強調(diào)了結(jié)論是紅外領(lǐng)域適合，也說了可作為可見波段的參考；我們引入的一個評價函數(shù)好像在它看來也不應(yīng)該.....這也是不適合的......） 這個審稿人是編輯找的第10個審稿人，前面的多是以too busy沒有參與，沒想到這第10個又貌似是與上次拒我文章的是同一個人，現(xiàn)在好混亂。。 是繼續(xù)改呢，可是真不知道怎么改，第一個審稿人只是說文章有個公式的顯示有問題，另外就是讓我分析下推導(dǎo)的直接計算公式是不是以前方法的更一般的形式；然后就是這個人的意見，無從下手。 改后從投，要是又送給了這個審稿人，我該怎么辦......... 請大神們給點意見，先謝了！ |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
309求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南航 335分 | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
求化學調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
085600，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
0703 化學 求調(diào)劑，一志愿山東大學 342 分
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南開大學0710生物學359求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
085600，專業(yè)課化工原理，320分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
-
290求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 投稿某期刊后,反饋如下意見,是修改后重投的意思嗎? 接受的可能性大嗎?
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 文章在沒有知會編輯的情況下修改重投可以嗎？
已經(jīng)有26人回復(fù)
- 請教大家一個問題：如何判斷一篇論文是好論文？
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- 會議文章被接收，但會還沒開，加了點內(nèi)容轉(zhuǎn)投期刊，沒引用，算一稿多投嗎？
已經(jīng)有43人回復(fù)
- Moderate Revise 后會換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- resubmitted----經(jīng)歷1年，這篇文章已經(jīng)被原來的雜志接收，感謝木蟲上大蝦們的幫助！
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 請給投Nature&Science的年輕人個鼓勵環(huán)境！
已經(jīng)有55人回復(fù)
dxhit
銀蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 222.9
- 帖子: 42
- 在線: 25.6小時
- 蟲號: 235385
- 注冊: 2006-04-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 紅外物理與技術(shù)
3樓2014-09-11 17:28:39
cheney2004
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 103 (高中生)
- 金幣: 8402
- 散金: 3023
- 紅花: 46
- 帖子: 3237
- 在線: 686.4小時
- 蟲號: 704070
- 注冊: 2009-02-19
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 電力系統(tǒng)
2樓2014-09-11 17:07:56
自私的貓1988
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 4800 (副教授)
- 貴賓: 6.746
- 金幣: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 紅花: 256
- 沙發(fā): 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在線: 1473.7小時
- 蟲號: 2004083
- 注冊: 2012-09-16
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 有機分子功能材料化學
- 管轄: 論文投稿
4樓2014-09-11 18:06:14
bj2008989
木蟲之王 (文學泰斗)
- 應(yīng)助: 501 (博士)
- 金幣: 67320.9
- 散金: 1806
- 紅花: 28
- 帖子: 51357
- 在線: 1003.7小時
- 蟲號: 471557
- 注冊: 2007-12-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 結(jié)構(gòu)工程
5樓2014-09-11 18:25:52
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工328分調(diào)劑 +7 | 。，。，。，。i 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料科學與工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑310 +12 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 面上5B能上會嗎？ +4 | redcom 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，專業(yè)課化工原理，321分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑，求導(dǎo)師收 +9 | 天天好運來上岸?/a> 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 爭取九點睡 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 071000生物學求調(diào)劑，初試成績343 +7 | 小小甜面團 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +6 | 十閑wx 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085404求調(diào)劑，總分309，本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富 +4 | 來財aa 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 求求讓我有書讀?/a> 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 351求調(diào)劑 +4 | 麥克阿磊 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料科學與工程 317求調(diào)劑 +4 | JKSOIID 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 336化工調(diào)劑 +4 | 王大坦1 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|