 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5074 | 回復(fù): 25 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
dxhit銀蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
文章重投又被拒，好像還是被同一個(gè)人拒，請(qǐng)大家給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn) 已有16人參與
|
|
|
第一次投的JOPT，兩個(gè)審稿人，一個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)很積極，而另外一個(gè)審稿人意見(jiàn)非常刻薄，簡(jiǎn)單的說(shuō)就是文章沒(méi)有新意，而且錯(cuò)誤很多，拒稿，下面附上這個(gè)人的審稿意見(jiàn) This manuscript does not present any new method to optimize design the MLDOE, and which only contribution may be in calculate process. About this point, the manuscript does not give out properly results. And there are several statements not appropriate and even some flaws. For these reasons this manuscript do not published on this Journal. The following are the questions and some mistakes in this manuscript: 1. The paper describes a calculated process to calculate the optimal surface relief height of MLDOEs directly, but this calculated process does not give out excited results, because the essence is to take the partial derivatives of fig. 2 in reference [6]. It is no different about how get the maximum point through partial derivatives or read directly. （確實(shí)是用了相同的目標(biāo)函數(shù)，但我們直接推導(dǎo)了最優(yōu)高度的解析解，不在需要迭代或枚舉優(yōu)化） 2. The analysis about the materials selection, fabrication tolerance sensitivity, influence of environmental temperature and angle of incidence almost had been published. This manuscript does not give out best conclusion, because the discussion about the fabrication tolerances is less rigorous, and the results are more approximate than the results of the existing methods.（完全沒(méi)看懂我們的文章，我們分析的是為了獲得最高、最穩(wěn)定的衍射效率，如何選材，不知道怎么就扯到了他提到的分析，而且是已經(jīng)做過(guò)的） Above all, there are many mistakes in the manuscript and the results don't show good and good results. So I do not find that the manuscript give out good results. So I think that this manuscript is not suitable for publication on this journal. 在被拒后，對(duì)第二個(gè)人的意見(jiàn)很無(wú)語(yǔ)，但是我們還是很認(rèn)真的分析了我們的文章，強(qiáng)調(diào)了我們的方法與原來(lái)方法的區(qū)別，并且對(duì)文章結(jié)構(gòu)也做了很大的修改，第一個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)當(dāng)然也全數(shù)消化。 改好后投又投了OA。還是兩審稿人，一個(gè)審稿人很快就完成了評(píng)審，覺(jué)得文章不錯(cuò)，“ I believe that this manuscript is appropriate for Applied Optics. ”；另外一個(gè)審稿人，先是要求更多的評(píng)閱時(shí)間，然后給出了拒稿的意見(jiàn)，從審稿意見(jiàn)上看，這與上次是同一個(gè)人，因?yàn)檎f(shuō)的話幾乎完全相同，下面是那個(gè)人的審稿意見(jiàn) This manuscript does not present any new method to optimize the MLDOE, and which only contribution may be in calculations. And the calculated results may be no true with compared to the method in the reference[6], because the results in this manuscript was calculated from the approximate method can be seen from Eq [6], meanwhile, this method is confused for readers and engineers, because the calculative method are more complex and many approximate process. There are several statements not appropriate andeven some flaws. For these reasons, the constant of this manuscript do not appropriate to publish on this journal. The followings are questions and some mistakes in this manuscript: 1. On page 2, there are some inappropriate expression and conspicuous mistake in formula (3), (6) and (7). This calculated process does not give out excited results, and become more complex. （我們的方法確實(shí)有近似，但是文章說(shuō)的很清楚，近似是合理的，而且確切的說(shuō)是準(zhǔn)確的，對(duì)比計(jì)算也證明了，而且公式哪有錯(cuò)��？完全沒(méi)錯(cuò)好不.....然后我們的方法直接就可以計(jì)算得到最優(yōu)結(jié)果，他卻說(shuō)相比于枚舉優(yōu)化計(jì)算更加復(fù)雜......） 2. In part 4, this manuscript proposed some different guidelines of material selection. But those calculate depends on the infrared fields which materials refractive index and Abbe number change a lot on a different band. It is not appropriate to use a whole wave band to replace that. This is why we usually design an infrared optical element in 3-5 and 8-12um waveband rather than 3-12um. Besides it is also led to the linearity of the refractive index difference discuss. Above all, I think that the constant of this manuscript is not suitable for publication on this journal. （說(shuō)我們得出的結(jié)論只是適合紅外領(lǐng)域。。這也是問(wèn)題，文中強(qiáng)調(diào)了結(jié)論是紅外領(lǐng)域適合，也說(shuō)了可作為可見(jiàn)波段的參考；我們引入的一個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)函數(shù)好像在它看來(lái)也不應(yīng)該.....這也是不適合的......） 這個(gè)審稿人是編輯找的第10個(gè)審稿人，前面的多是以too busy沒(méi)有參與，沒(méi)想到這第10個(gè)又貌似是與上次拒我文章的是同一個(gè)人，現(xiàn)在好混亂。。 是繼續(xù)改呢，可是真不知道怎么改，第一個(gè)審稿人只是說(shuō)文章有個(gè)公式的顯示有問(wèn)題，另外就是讓我分析下推導(dǎo)的直接計(jì)算公式是不是以前方法的更一般的形式；然后就是這個(gè)人的意見(jiàn)，無(wú)從下手。 改后從投，要是又送給了這個(gè)審稿人，我該怎么辦......... 請(qǐng)大神們給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn)，先謝了！ |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
262求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
303求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
300求調(diào)劑，材料科學(xué)英一數(shù)二
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工（085600）296求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
-
307求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
286分調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑323材料與化工
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
322求調(diào)劑：一志愿湖南大學(xué) 材料與化工（085600），已過(guò)六級(jí)。
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
292求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 投稿某期刊后,反饋如下意見(jiàn),是修改后重投的意思嗎? 接受的可能性大嗎?
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 文章在沒(méi)有知會(huì)編輯的情況下修改重投可以嗎？
已經(jīng)有26人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)教大家一個(gè)問(wèn)題：如何判斷一篇論文是好論文？
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- 會(huì)議文章被接收，但會(huì)還沒(méi)開(kāi)，加了點(diǎn)內(nèi)容轉(zhuǎn)投期刊，沒(méi)引用，算一稿多投嗎？
已經(jīng)有43人回復(fù)
- Moderate Revise 后會(huì)換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- resubmitted----經(jīng)歷1年，這篇文章已經(jīng)被原來(lái)的雜志接收，感謝木蟲(chóng)上大蝦們的幫助！
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)給投Nature&Science的年輕人個(gè)鼓勵(lì)環(huán)境！
已經(jīng)有55人回復(fù)
自私的貓1988
榮譽(yù)版主 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 4800 (副教授)
- 貴賓: 6.746
- 金幣: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 紅花: 256
- 沙發(fā): 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在線: 1473.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 2004083
- 注冊(cè): 2012-09-16
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 有機(jī)分子功能材料化學(xué)
- 管轄: 論文投稿
4樓2014-09-11 18:06:14
cheney2004
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 103 (高中生)
- 金幣: 8402
- 散金: 3023
- 紅花: 46
- 帖子: 3237
- 在線: 686.4小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 704070
- 注冊(cè): 2009-02-19
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 電力系統(tǒng)
2樓2014-09-11 17:07:56
dxhit
銀蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 222.9
- 帖子: 42
- 在線: 25.6小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 235385
- 注冊(cè): 2006-04-01
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 紅外物理與技術(shù)
3樓2014-09-11 17:28:39
bj2008989
木蟲(chóng)之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
- 應(yīng)助: 501 (博士)
- 金幣: 67320.9
- 散金: 1806
- 紅花: 28
- 帖子: 51357
- 在線: 1003.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 471557
- 注冊(cè): 2007-12-02
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 結(jié)構(gòu)工程
5樓2014-09-11 18:25:52
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑 +7 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 277跪求調(diào)劑 +7 | 1915668 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) +14 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 求調(diào)劑 有機(jī)化學(xué)考研356分 +10 | Nadiums 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300一志愿211，312分求調(diào)劑院校 +4 | 小黃鴨寶 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑 +14 | jhybd 2026-03-23 | 19/950 |
|
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小卡不卡. 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 294分080500材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +8 | 柳溪邊 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +5 | BrightLL 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 壓國(guó)家一區(qū)線，求導(dǎo)師收留，有恩必謝！ +7 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +6 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過(guò) 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | 起個(gè)名咋這么難 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +3 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中國(guó)科學(xué)院深圳先進(jìn)技術(shù)研究院-光纖傳感課題組招生-中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué)、深圳理工大學(xué)聯(lián)培 +5 | YangTyu1 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小羊睡著了? 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|