 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1745 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一次投文章，此審稿意見有希望嗎？該怎樣回答問題？ 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
Dear Prof. Dr. Li: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit. With sincere regards, ------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript describes blends of a bio-oil produced through hydrothermal liquefaction following a previously reported pretreatment step termed “chemical-biological” with aviation kerosene and aviation gasoline. The work is interesting, important in the highly active field of renewable aviation fuels, and warrants publication in Energy & Fuels, however it seems somewhat incomplete. The authors should address the points below prior to this work being published. 1. 。。。。。。。 2. 。。。。。。 3. 。。。。。 4. 。。。。。。 5. 。。。。。。。 Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Good ------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: The main issue with this work is that the researchers take a highly acidic material and use it in aviation fuel. No airline manufacturer would let this near any of the materials used in an aircraft. What I suggest it that the researchers take the HTL oil and remove or esterify the acidic content, to give a neutral fuel that could potentially be compatible - if the researchers could do that, then do the fuel properties of this fuel (and maybe compare to the acidic oil) then I think it could be reviewed again and perhaps published. In addition I am a little unclear on the explanations given for the fuel properties which appear to be contradictory. I think more experimentation is needed to show what is going on here. For example - Section 3.3.2 is very poorly argued. We need to see more experimentation here. What components have gone into the aviation kerosene? We need experimental proof, as it seems you have dissolved a highly oxygenated species into the jet fuel and got the energy density to increase! Section 3.3.3 you need to explain why the freezing point went down, again, if you are putting in low molecular weight oxygenates – maybe I can see that, but large energy dense alkanes?! I should point out that palmitic acid has a melting point of 60 degC! So the results in this section really don’t correlate with what was observed in the previous section. More experiments are needed to explain what has happened here. Also the flash point is now below the standards allowed, so this fuel really cant be used at all. Please explain why this is the case Further issues: Introduction – Please check all references, some of the papers cited are not the ones discussed. Experimental – not sure what AR means Table 1 and 2, figure 1 can all go in supporting information Conclusions – no, this approach can not be used for aviation fuels. The too low flash points and high acidity tell us that. Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Poor Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Poor -------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions. Comments: Very good paper.Need to add statistical analysis of the results example to include standard deviation for reproducibility Additional Questions: Originality: Excellent Technical Quality: Excellent Clarity of Presentation: Excellent Importance to Field: Excellent |
回復(fù)此樓» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
QSZWDSWWD» 猜你喜歡
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
材料工程專碩 348分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南大，0703化學(xué)，分數(shù)336，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
322求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
297求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
生物學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
工科0856求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 第一次投英文文章，回來意見——發(fā)呆中……
已經(jīng)有112人回復(fù)
- 小弟第一次投稿，編輯意見如何回復(fù)（貌似大修）
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 審稿周期快，投稿難度小的材料類雜志
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 文章在第二次修改投出期間，所投雜志影響因子下降了1分左右，對投稿有影響嗎？
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，是否應(yīng)按審稿意見更改后再投
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- AM接收，第一次在此發(fā)帖，順便分享投稿過程
已經(jīng)有108人回復(fù)
- 求電化學(xué)類審稿快一點，影響因子較低的SCI期刊！
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 文章歷時三年，多次被拒，終被RSC ADV接收，聊以記之，以饗蟲友。
已經(jīng)有376人回復(fù)
- 意見是退修再審，還有一些外審給的意見不明白，第一次投稿，望大蟲們指點！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 投ACS里面的一個雜志，大修，請教一些問題
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 兩個審稿意見，我該怎樣應(yīng)對
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 請問電化學(xué)類的文章投到哪里好呢，第一次投英文的
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
- 俺的幾次投稿經(jīng)歷，希望對大家有幫助，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有63人回復(fù)
- 談?wù)勛约哼@學(xué)期多次投稿經(jīng)歷，跟大家交流下，希望大家能進來看看！
已經(jīng)有53人回復(fù)
- 【又到論文投稿時】四篇文章，兩次拒稿信
已經(jīng)有195人回復(fù)
4樓2015-08-19 13:50:30
2樓2015-08-19 13:41:15
3樓2015-08-19 13:45:57
5樓2015-08-20 10:09:36
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 沿岸有貝殼6 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jack?k?y 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +9 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ，070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩，總分287，雙非一本，求調(diào)劑。 +4 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交通 專碩 材料355 本科雙非 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 西南交通專材355 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 295復(fù)試調(diào)劑
+8
|
簡木ChuFront 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +22 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 22/1100 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +7 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 緒幸與子 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【同濟軟件】軟件（085405）考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +11 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|