 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1740 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
[交流]
第一次投文章，此審稿意見有希望嗎？該怎樣回答問題？ 已有2人參與
|
|
Dear Prof. Dr. Li: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit. With sincere regards, ------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript describes blends of a bio-oil produced through hydrothermal liquefaction following a previously reported pretreatment step termed “chemical-biological” with aviation kerosene and aviation gasoline. The work is interesting, important in the highly active field of renewable aviation fuels, and warrants publication in Energy & Fuels, however it seems somewhat incomplete. The authors should address the points below prior to this work being published. 1. 。。。。。。。 2. 。。。。。。 3. 。。。。。 4. 。。。。。。 5. 。。。。。。。 Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Good ------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: The main issue with this work is that the researchers take a highly acidic material and use it in aviation fuel. No airline manufacturer would let this near any of the materials used in an aircraft. What I suggest it that the researchers take the HTL oil and remove or esterify the acidic content, to give a neutral fuel that could potentially be compatible - if the researchers could do that, then do the fuel properties of this fuel (and maybe compare to the acidic oil) then I think it could be reviewed again and perhaps published. In addition I am a little unclear on the explanations given for the fuel properties which appear to be contradictory. I think more experimentation is needed to show what is going on here. For example - Section 3.3.2 is very poorly argued. We need to see more experimentation here. What components have gone into the aviation kerosene? We need experimental proof, as it seems you have dissolved a highly oxygenated species into the jet fuel and got the energy density to increase! Section 3.3.3 you need to explain why the freezing point went down, again, if you are putting in low molecular weight oxygenates – maybe I can see that, but large energy dense alkanes?! I should point out that palmitic acid has a melting point of 60 degC! So the results in this section really don’t correlate with what was observed in the previous section. More experiments are needed to explain what has happened here. Also the flash point is now below the standards allowed, so this fuel really cant be used at all. Please explain why this is the case Further issues: Introduction – Please check all references, some of the papers cited are not the ones discussed. Experimental – not sure what AR means Table 1 and 2, figure 1 can all go in supporting information Conclusions – no, this approach can not be used for aviation fuels. The too low flash points and high acidity tell us that. Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Poor Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Poor -------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions. Comments: Very good paper.Need to add statistical analysis of the results example to include standard deviation for reproducibility Additional Questions: Originality: Excellent Technical Quality: Excellent Clarity of Presentation: Excellent Importance to Field: Excellent |
回復(fù)此樓» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
QSZWDSWWD» 猜你喜歡
材料與化工（0856）304求 B區(qū) 調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
268求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
265求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
350 本科985求調(diào)劑，求老登收留
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
【考研調(diào)劑】化學(xué)專業(yè) 281分，一志愿四川大學(xué)，誠心求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
初試 317
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 第一次投英文文章，回來意見——發(fā)呆中……
已經(jīng)有112人回復(fù)
- 小弟第一次投稿，編輯意見如何回復(fù)（貌似大修）
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 審稿周期快，投稿難度小的材料類雜志
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 文章在第二次修改投出期間，所投雜志影響因子下降了1分左右，對投稿有影響嗎？
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，是否應(yīng)按審稿意見更改后再投
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- AM接收，第一次在此發(fā)帖，順便分享投稿過程
已經(jīng)有108人回復(fù)
- 求電化學(xué)類審稿快一點，影響因子較低的SCI期刊！
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 文章歷時三年，多次被拒，終被RSC ADV接收，聊以記之，以饗蟲友。
已經(jīng)有376人回復(fù)
- 意見是退修再審，還有一些外審給的意見不明白，第一次投稿，望大蟲們指點！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 投ACS里面的一個雜志，大修，請教一些問題
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 兩個審稿意見，我該怎樣應(yīng)對
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 請問電化學(xué)類的文章投到哪里好呢，第一次投英文的
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
- 俺的幾次投稿經(jīng)歷，希望對大家有幫助，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有63人回復(fù)
- 談?wù)勛约哼@學(xué)期多次投稿經(jīng)歷，跟大家交流下，希望大家能進來看看！
已經(jīng)有53人回復(fù)
- 【又到論文投稿時】四篇文章，兩次拒稿信
已經(jīng)有195人回復(fù)
2樓2015-08-19 13:41:15
3樓2015-08-19 13:45:57
4樓2015-08-19 13:50:30
5樓2015-08-20 10:09:36
6樓2015-08-22 14:05:42
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 學(xué)員mji1Rl 的主題更新
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085601調(diào)劑 358分 +3 | zzzzggh 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料 271求調(diào)劑 +3 | 展信悅_ 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué)材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 楓橋ZL 2026-03-18 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 310求調(diào)劑 +3 | baibai1314 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)（081702）315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑求學(xué)校推薦 +3 | 伯樂29 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 323求調(diào)劑 +3 | 洼小桶 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 295復(fù)試調(diào)劑
+8
|
簡木ChuFront 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 260求調(diào)劑 +3 | 朱芷琳 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 353求調(diào)劑 +3 | 拉鉤不許變 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國海洋大學(xué)，生物學(xué)，301分，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑，一志愿華南理工大學(xué)071005 +5 | ioodiiij 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機化學(xué)，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277材料科學(xué)與工程080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|