| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1744 | 回復: 5 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一次投文章,此審稿意見有希望嗎?該怎樣回答問題? 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
Dear Prof. Dr. Li: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit. With sincere regards, ------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript describes blends of a bio-oil produced through hydrothermal liquefaction following a previously reported pretreatment step termed “chemical-biological” with aviation kerosene and aviation gasoline. The work is interesting, important in the highly active field of renewable aviation fuels, and warrants publication in Energy & Fuels, however it seems somewhat incomplete. The authors should address the points below prior to this work being published. 1. 。。。。。。。 2. 。。。。。。 3. 。。。。。 4. 。。。。。。 5. 。。。。。。。 Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Good ------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: The main issue with this work is that the researchers take a highly acidic material and use it in aviation fuel. No airline manufacturer would let this near any of the materials used in an aircraft. What I suggest it that the researchers take the HTL oil and remove or esterify the acidic content, to give a neutral fuel that could potentially be compatible - if the researchers could do that, then do the fuel properties of this fuel (and maybe compare to the acidic oil) then I think it could be reviewed again and perhaps published. In addition I am a little unclear on the explanations given for the fuel properties which appear to be contradictory. I think more experimentation is needed to show what is going on here. For example - Section 3.3.2 is very poorly argued. We need to see more experimentation here. What components have gone into the aviation kerosene? We need experimental proof, as it seems you have dissolved a highly oxygenated species into the jet fuel and got the energy density to increase! Section 3.3.3 you need to explain why the freezing point went down, again, if you are putting in low molecular weight oxygenates – maybe I can see that, but large energy dense alkanes?! I should point out that palmitic acid has a melting point of 60 degC! So the results in this section really don’t correlate with what was observed in the previous section. More experiments are needed to explain what has happened here. Also the flash point is now below the standards allowed, so this fuel really cant be used at all. Please explain why this is the case Further issues: Introduction – Please check all references, some of the papers cited are not the ones discussed. Experimental – not sure what AR means Table 1 and 2, figure 1 can all go in supporting information Conclusions – no, this approach can not be used for aviation fuels. The too low flash points and high acidity tell us that. Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Poor Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Poor -------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions. Comments: Very good paper.Need to add statistical analysis of the results example to include standard deviation for reproducibility Additional Questions: Originality: Excellent Technical Quality: Excellent Clarity of Presentation: Excellent Importance to Field: Excellent |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料學碩301分求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 生物學一志愿985,分數(shù)349求調(diào)劑 +3 | zxts12 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | 某某某某位 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 楓橋ZL 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211 +14 | chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學學碩080502 337求調(diào)劑-一志愿華中科技大學 +4 | 順順順mr 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +5 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梨花珞晚風 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 中南大學化學學碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 本人考085602 化學工程 專碩 +19 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-15 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學材料學碩321求調(diào)劑 +11 | Ymlll 2026-03-18 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +7 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 086500 325 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 領(lǐng)帶小熊 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑,一志愿華南理工大學071005 +5 | ioodiiij 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數(shù)二 +10 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學學碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 太陽花天天開心 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|