 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1746 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一次投文章，此審稿意見(jiàn)有希望嗎？該怎樣回答問(wèn)題？ 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
Dear Prof. Dr. Li: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit. With sincere regards, ------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript describes blends of a bio-oil produced through hydrothermal liquefaction following a previously reported pretreatment step termed “chemical-biological” with aviation kerosene and aviation gasoline. The work is interesting, important in the highly active field of renewable aviation fuels, and warrants publication in Energy & Fuels, however it seems somewhat incomplete. The authors should address the points below prior to this work being published. 1. 。。。。。。。 2. 。。。。。。 3. 。。。。。 4. 。。。。。。 5. 。。。。。。。 Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Good ------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: The main issue with this work is that the researchers take a highly acidic material and use it in aviation fuel. No airline manufacturer would let this near any of the materials used in an aircraft. What I suggest it that the researchers take the HTL oil and remove or esterify the acidic content, to give a neutral fuel that could potentially be compatible - if the researchers could do that, then do the fuel properties of this fuel (and maybe compare to the acidic oil) then I think it could be reviewed again and perhaps published. In addition I am a little unclear on the explanations given for the fuel properties which appear to be contradictory. I think more experimentation is needed to show what is going on here. For example - Section 3.3.2 is very poorly argued. We need to see more experimentation here. What components have gone into the aviation kerosene? We need experimental proof, as it seems you have dissolved a highly oxygenated species into the jet fuel and got the energy density to increase! Section 3.3.3 you need to explain why the freezing point went down, again, if you are putting in low molecular weight oxygenates – maybe I can see that, but large energy dense alkanes?! I should point out that palmitic acid has a melting point of 60 degC! So the results in this section really don’t correlate with what was observed in the previous section. More experiments are needed to explain what has happened here. Also the flash point is now below the standards allowed, so this fuel really cant be used at all. Please explain why this is the case Further issues: Introduction – Please check all references, some of the papers cited are not the ones discussed. Experimental – not sure what AR means Table 1 and 2, figure 1 can all go in supporting information Conclusions – no, this approach can not be used for aviation fuels. The too low flash points and high acidity tell us that. Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Poor Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Poor -------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions. Comments: Very good paper.Need to add statistical analysis of the results example to include standard deviation for reproducibility Additional Questions: Originality: Excellent Technical Quality: Excellent Clarity of Presentation: Excellent Importance to Field: Excellent |
回復(fù)此樓» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
QSZWDSWWD» 猜你喜歡
一志愿北京化工大學(xué)070300 學(xué)碩336求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
286分人工智能專業(yè)請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(qǐng)(333分)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
280求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
269專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑院校信息
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料學(xué)碩301分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
初試 317
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
一志愿211，0703化學(xué)310分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 第一次投英文文章，回來(lái)意見(jiàn)——發(fā)呆中……
已經(jīng)有112人回復(fù)
- 小弟第一次投稿，編輯意見(jiàn)如何回復(fù)（貌似大修）
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 審稿周期快，投稿難度小的材料類雜志
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 文章在第二次修改投出期間，所投雜志影響因子下降了1分左右，對(duì)投稿有影響嗎？
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，是否應(yīng)按審稿意見(jiàn)更改后再投
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- AM接收，第一次在此發(fā)帖，順便分享投稿過(guò)程
已經(jīng)有108人回復(fù)
- 求電化學(xué)類審稿快一點(diǎn)，影響因子較低的SCI期刊！
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 文章歷時(shí)三年，多次被拒，終被RSC ADV接收，聊以記之，以饗蟲(chóng)友。
已經(jīng)有376人回復(fù)
- 意見(jiàn)是退修再審，還有一些外審給的意見(jiàn)不明白，第一次投稿，望大蟲(chóng)們指點(diǎn)！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 投ACS里面的一個(gè)雜志，大修，請(qǐng)教一些問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 兩個(gè)審稿意見(jiàn)，我該怎樣應(yīng)對(duì)
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)問(wèn)電化學(xué)類的文章投到哪里好呢，第一次投英文的
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
- 俺的幾次投稿經(jīng)歷，希望對(duì)大家有幫助，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有63人回復(fù)
- 談?wù)勛约哼@學(xué)期多次投稿經(jīng)歷，跟大家交流下，希望大家能進(jìn)來(lái)看看！
已經(jīng)有53人回復(fù)
- 【又到論文投稿時(shí)】四篇文章，兩次拒稿信
已經(jīng)有195人回復(fù)
5樓2015-08-20 10:09:36
2樓2015-08-19 13:41:15
3樓2015-08-19 13:45:57
4樓2015-08-19 13:50:30
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 山東省面上項(xiàng)目限額評(píng)審 +3 | 石瑞0426 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0805 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大雪深藏 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求助 +5 | 夢(mèng)里的無(wú)言 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | .m.. 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ，070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩，總分287，雙非一本，求調(diào)劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +4 | 一志愿京區(qū)211 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)，327分，材料與化工085600 +9 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 藥學(xué)383 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 藥學(xué)chy 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學(xué)（0703）總分337求調(diào)劑 +8 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑（0805） +14 | 煙汐憶海 2026-03-16 | 25/1250 |
|
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請(qǐng)回稿延期一個(gè)月，編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時(shí)間沒(méi)變，給編輯又寫(xiě)郵件了，沒(méi)回復(fù)
 10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | pupcoco 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yanyali 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|