| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1995 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見(jiàn) 已有6人參與
|
||
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號(hào)里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +8 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +7 | 好運(yùn)連綿不絕 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +5 | 搗蛋豬豬 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 【0856】化學(xué)工程(085602)313 分,本科學(xué)科評(píng)估A類院校化學(xué)工程與工藝,誠(chéng)求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小劉快快上岸 2026-03-11 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)]
今年的國(guó)基金是打分制嗎?
50+3
|
zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +6 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-15 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +10 | 小樓。 2026-03-12 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢(mèng)微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)]
有必要更換申報(bào)口嗎
20+3
|
fannyamoy 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 285 求調(diào)劑 資源與環(huán)境 一志愿北京化工大學(xué) +3 | 未名考生 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +6 | Iuruoh 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 310求調(diào)劑 +3 | 【上上簽】 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化工學(xué)碩306求調(diào)劑 +9 | 42838695 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考博] 福州大學(xué)楊黃浩課題組招收2026年專業(yè)學(xué)位博士研究生,2026.03.20截止 +3 | Xiangyu_ou 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|