| 查看: 2041 | 回復: 12 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學 +14 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703本科鄭州大學求調(diào)劑 +7 | nhj_ 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,專業(yè)課化工原理,320分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑310 +12 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 求收留 +5 | 1943443204 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +7 | 江辭666 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華北電力大學能動專碩,293,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 15537177284 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +3 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖! 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +10 | A-哆啦Z夢 2026-03-23 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 279 分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睡個好覺_16 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +3 | 溪云珂 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂樂樂 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 機械學碩310分,數(shù)一英一,一志愿211本科雙非找調(diào)劑信息 +3 | @357 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +3 | yanzhixue111 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|