| 查看: 1994 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ,六級已過,有科研經(jīng)歷 +8 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +5 | 搗蛋豬豬 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 211本,11408一志愿中科院277分,曾在中科院自動化所實(shí)習(xí) +6 | Losir 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專碩319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料080500調(diào)劑求收留 +3 | 一顆meteor 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 快樂的香蕉 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 085600英一數(shù)二總分302 前三科235 精通機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí) 一志愿哈工大 +4 | 林yaxin 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +9 | ADT 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 工科,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我887 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 球球古力 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
投稿問題
5+4
|
星光燦爛xt 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 資源與環(huán)境 285 +3 | 未名考生 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 福州大學(xué)楊黃浩課題組招收2026年專業(yè)學(xué)位博士研究生,2026.03.20截止 +3 | Xiangyu_ou 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|