| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1992 | 回復: 12 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
||
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
本帖內容被屏蔽 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 332求調劑 +6 | Zz版 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調劑南林,給自己招師弟中~ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 267一志愿南京工業(yè)大學0817化工求調劑 +6 | SUICHILD 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調劑 +5 | 時間點 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調劑,求各位老師收留 +8 | 秋有木北 2026-03-14 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 277材料科學與工程080500求調劑 +3 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調劑 290分有科研經(jīng)歷,論文在投 +7 | 膩膩gk 2026-03-14 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
笨笨兔子 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料與化工319求調劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703,333分求調劑 一志愿鄭州大學-物理化學 +3 | 李魔女斗篷 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調劑 +6 | Iuruoh 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +5 | 一定有學上- 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料301分求調劑 +5 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 大連大學化學專業(yè)研究生調劑 +3 | 琪久. 2026-03-10 | 8/400 |
|