| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2000 | 回復: 12 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
||
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +7 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yy7400 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化學調(diào)劑0703 +8 | 啊我我的 2026-03-11 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑 +3 | Zys010410@ 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程315分求調(diào)劑 +3 | yang_0104 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 閆旭東 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 331求調(diào)劑(0703有機化學 +5 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 招收0805(材料)調(diào)劑 +3 | 18595523086 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 +4 | 快樂的香蕉 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑一志愿 985 總分 295 +8 | dream…… 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩350 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王金科 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小匕仔汁 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277求調(diào)劑 +4 | anchor17 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 270求調(diào)劑 085600材料與化工專碩 +3 | YXCT 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑,材料、化工皆可 +8 | 蘇打水7777 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|