 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
小木蟲論壇-學術科研互動平臺 » 學術交流區(qū) » 論文投稿 » 交流 » globecom2012被拒反饋意見
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1996 | 回復: 12 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
||
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數字什么意思？ |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
268求調劑
已經有3人回復
-
302求調劑
已經有5人回復
-
311求調劑
已經有10人回復
-
被我言中：新模板不強調格式了，假專家開始管格式了
已經有4人回復
-
303求調劑
已經有5人回復
-
考研求調劑
已經有4人回復
-
085601專碩，總分342求調劑，地區(qū)不限
已經有4人回復
-
085601材料工程專碩求調劑
已經有5人回復
-
一志愿天津大學化學工藝專業(yè)（081702）315分求調劑
已經有6人回復
-
能源材料化學課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名
已經有6人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- optical engineering 大修后意見為小修后錄用，另圖片質量問題求助
已經有11人回復
- 2012年基金限2項的對策理解——同時申請面上和小杰青可行嗎？
已經有17人回復
- 有什么渠道可以向全國哲社規(guī)劃辦反饋意見？2012年不能再限額申報了！
已經有28人回復
- 2012校園招聘信息--上海聯(lián)影醫(yī)療科技有限公司（打造世界級的中國醫(yī)療設備公司離不開您
已經有3人回復
- 如何從“申請項目同行評議意見反饋信”看是否上會
已經有33人回復
- 文章被拒了，麻煩各位高手進來幫忙分析下拒絕意見。謝謝
已經有12人回復
- 論文被拒，編輯意見改后重投
已經有15人回復
- 被J.Phys.Chem C拒了，2個審稿人意見差別很大，遇到這種情況我該咋辦
已經有16人回復
- 被拒了，要改投，可是投哪里很迷茫，請各位給點意見，謝謝
已經有24人回復
霸王別姬
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 7965.8
- 散金: 1401
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 951
- 在線: 197.6小時
- 蟲號: 1632921
- 注冊: 2012-02-21
- 專業(yè): 計算機網絡
7樓2012-08-29 09:00:08
★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
|
本帖內容被屏蔽 |
2樓2012-07-03 18:54:02
liyingsong
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 285 (大學生)
- 金幣: 1550.7
- 散金: 266
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 1350
- 在線: 51.5小時
- 蟲號: 928270
- 注冊: 2009-12-15
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)
4樓2012-07-03 19:13:59
xiajimu
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應助: 1703 (講師)
- 金幣: 12573.5
- 散金: 9739
- 紅花: 35
- 帖子: 5940
- 在線: 2164.6小時
- 蟲號: 288243
- 注冊: 2006-10-21
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 化學工程及工業(yè)化學
5樓2012-07-03 19:19:55
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +9 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學調劑 ，六級已過，有科研經歷 +8 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調劑 +5 | 上岸的小葡 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調劑南林，給自己招師弟中～ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學，080500材料科學與工程，調劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調劑 +10 | 小樓。 2026-03-12 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工一志愿南昌大學327求調劑推薦 +7 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學調劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調劑 +5 | 加油加油！? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專碩319求調劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 復試調劑 +3 | 呼呼？~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求調劑 +5 | 閆旭東 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
有必要更換申報口嗎
 20+3
|
fannyamoy 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【考研調劑求收留】 +3 | Ceciilia 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調劑 +5 | 超級伊昂大王 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科278分求調劑 +5 | 周慢熱啊 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調劑 +3 | S.H1 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[論文投稿]
投稿問題
5+4
|
星光燦爛xt 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|