| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2017 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
霸王別姬木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
globecom2012被拒反饋意見 已有6人參與
|
||
|
> *** Relevance and timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research. Good (4) > *** Technical content and scientific rigour: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), its soundness and scientific rigour. Solid work of notable importance. (4) > *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) > *** Quality of presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references. Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) > *** Strong aspects: Comments to the author: what are the strong aspects of the paper Timely and useful. The paper's main contribution, despite the claim in the introduction, is the ability to compose chains of caches together to evaluate their performance. > *** Weak aspects: Comments to the author: what are the weak aspects of the paper? First, this reviewer must ask if nothing similar has been done in the CDN (Content Distribution Network) community? There must be a wealth of information and related work from that space. * A few references are missing from experimental networks, with space available. * Writing is very inconsistent. In places it is fluid and elegant. In others it is barely comprehensible. * RVRTT assumes knowledge. Some explanation and examples are required. * Some equations lack intuition/explanation, for example (2) and (3). Also, D in (1) is not defined. * Section IV is the main contribution of this paper, yet it is the most difficult to comprehend given the amount of missing information. * FIgure 4b. Despite claim, there is no statistical difference between these curves. Also, why the fall in probability after k=3? > *** Recommended changes: Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted. * Address above issues, with focus on the RVRTT issue. * Reduce use of 'Clearly' - rarely do statements and observations so clearly emerge. * No appendices, as claimed. 后面括號里的數(shù)字什么意思? |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-求調(diào)劑 +8 | 手機(jī)用戶 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑,一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +3 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +20 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +5 | February_Feb 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +8 | 何潤采123 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 18889395102 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 招收調(diào)劑碩士 +4 | lidianxing 2026-03-19 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +3 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑[0856] +3 | WayneLim327 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 本科鄭州大學(xué)物理學(xué)院,一志愿華科070200學(xué)碩,346求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我不是一根蔥 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項核心論文五項專利,省、國級證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +6 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Zz版 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小賈同學(xué)123 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請]
今年的國基金是打分制嗎?
50+3
|
zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|