| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2983 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
尋找光陰新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
sci投稿給了一審意見,被拒稿了,但是我覺得文章還行,想要申訴,該怎么處理?
|
||
|
REFEREE’S REPORT Points for Evaluation of the paper 1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication. No 2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)? Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented). 3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation. In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34. 4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature? With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated. (ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant? Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference. 5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear? Yes 6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published (i) as it is (ii) with minor modifications (iii) with major modifications (iv) rejected Specific comments, if any: -Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2. [ Last edited by 尋找光陰 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ] |
專家顧問 (知名作家)
學(xué)習(xí)使人進(jìn)步
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +1781 |

鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑!生物與醫(yī)藥專碩 +4 | 逆轉(zhuǎn)陸先生 2026-04-01 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北交大材料工程總分358 +3 | cs0106 2026-04-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩322分 +11 | 哈哈哈吼吼吼哈 2026-04-01 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 367求調(diào)劑 +8 | 芋泥啵啵… 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +10 | 呢呢妮妮 2026-04-01 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程專碩324分,一志愿中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +7 | 耿耿1314 2026-04-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703求調(diào)劑 +4 | zizimo 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | 駱駝男人 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +7 | hanamiko 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機(jī)化學(xué) +11 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +9 | akdhjs 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工272求調(diào)劑 +25 | 阿斯蒂芬2004 2026-03-28 | 25/1250 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | Faune 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調(diào)劑 +7 | ZZ..000 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +16 | kikiki7 2026-03-30 | 16/800 |
|
|
[有機(jī)交流] 考研調(diào)劑 +8 | watb 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青春裁為三截 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | raojunqi0129 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|