| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2985 | 回復: 9 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
尋找光陰新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
sci投稿給了一審意見,被拒稿了,但是我覺得文章還行,想要申訴,該怎么處理?
|
||
|
REFEREE’S REPORT Points for Evaluation of the paper 1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication. No 2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)? Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented). 3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation. In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34. 4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature? With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated. (ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant? Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference. 5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear? Yes 6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published (i) as it is (ii) with minor modifications (iii) with major modifications (iv) rejected Specific comments, if any: -Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2. [ Last edited by 尋找光陰 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ] |
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
專家顧問 (知名作家)
學習使人進步
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +1781 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzz,,r 2026-04-02 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 270求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小杰pp 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 377求調(diào)劑 +3 | RASKIN 2026-04-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 307分求調(diào)劑 +14 | (o~o) 2026-03-31 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 圖鑒212 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | 駱駝男人 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 安徽大學專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分,英語已過四六級,六級521,求調(diào)劑 +10 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +3 | 迷蒙木木 2026-04-01 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程302調(diào)劑環(huán)化或化工 +15 | Doleres 2026-03-31 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑申請 +8 | 張張張張zy 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿:西北大學,英一數(shù)一408-284分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 12.27 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 352分-085602-一志愿985 +6 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿a區(qū)211,085601-307分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 黨嘉豪 2026-03-31 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 求收留 +8 | 1943443204 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南開大學0710生物學359求調(diào)劑 +5 | 兔兔兔111223314 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +6 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +8 | RuiFairyrui 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求佛 +7 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|