| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2981 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
尋找光陰新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
sci投稿給了一審意見,被拒稿了,但是我覺得文章還行,想要申訴,該怎么處理?
|
|
REFEREE’S REPORT Points for Evaluation of the paper 1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication. No 2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)? Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented). 3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation. In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34. 4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature? With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated. (ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant? Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference. 5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear? Yes 6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published (i) as it is (ii) with minor modifications (iii) with major modifications (iv) rejected Specific comments, if any: -Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2. [ Last edited by 尋找光陰 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ] |
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
專家顧問 (知名作家)
學(xué)習(xí)使人進(jìn)步
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +1781 |

銅蟲 (小有名氣)
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
銀蟲 (初入文壇)
| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩化學(xué)工程與技術(shù),一志愿中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)320+求調(diào)劑 +8 | 披星河 2026-04-02 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京科技大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩328分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 1段時(shí)間 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料化工340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑11408 +4 | 劉小鹿lu 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +23 | 新時(shí)代材料 2026-03-27 | 26/1300 |
|
|
[考研] 土木304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 兔突突突, 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +8 | 15172915737 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海海洋大學(xué)083200食品學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑,接受其他專業(yè) +5 | what張 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 江蘇科技大學(xué)招材料研究生 +4 | Su032713. 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +12 | waltzh 2026-04-01 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交大材料學(xué)碩(英一數(shù)二)347,求調(diào)劑到高分子/材料相關(guān)專業(yè) +7 | zju51 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +5 | FZAC123 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +7 | @taotao 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崽崽仔 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +13 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-29 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +8 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +16 | kikiki7 2026-03-30 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 化學(xué) 求調(diào)劑,一志愿山東大學(xué) 342 分 +7 | Shern—- 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學(xué)abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|