| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2984 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
尋找光陰新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
sci投稿給了一審意見,被拒稿了,但是我覺得文章還行,想要申訴,該怎么處理?
|
||
|
REFEREE’S REPORT Points for Evaluation of the paper 1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication. No 2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)? Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented). 3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation. In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34. 4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature? With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated. (ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant? Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference. 5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear? Yes 6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published (i) as it is (ii) with minor modifications (iii) with major modifications (iv) rejected Specific comments, if any: -Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2. [ Last edited by 尋找光陰 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ] |
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
專家顧問 (知名作家)
學(xué)習(xí)使人進(jìn)步
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +1781 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 302分初試 0854 +3 | 伶可樂 2026-04-02 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +13 | Mary Keen 2026-03-28 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 初試301,代碼085701環(huán)境工程,本碩一致,四六級已過,有二區(qū)一作,共發(fā)表5篇論文 +6 | axibli 2026-04-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +14 | 小黃鴨寶 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 270調(diào)劑 +7 | maxjxbsk 2026-04-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +12 | Amber00 2026-03-31 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 0703求調(diào)劑 +4 | zizimo 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +19 | 誰不是少年 2026-03-29 | 19/950 |
|
|
[考研] 英一數(shù)二生物信息學(xué)287分,本科生物科學(xué),求調(diào)劑 +3 | 碧水xyz 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +7 | @taotao 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +11 | 一樣YWY 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程302調(diào)劑環(huán)化或化工 +15 | Doleres 2026-03-31 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學(xué)有機(jī)化學(xué)專業(yè),初試351分,復(fù)試被刷求調(diào)劑! +9 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑 +15 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑求助 +7 | 13287130938 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +8 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +12 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 11408軟件工程求調(diào)劑 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +7 | 江辭666 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-314 +3 | LILIQQ 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|