| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2986 | 回復: 9 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
尋找光陰新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
sci投稿給了一審意見,被拒稿了,但是我覺得文章還行,想要申訴,該怎么處理?
|
||
|
REFEREE’S REPORT Points for Evaluation of the paper 1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication. No 2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)? Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented). 3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation. In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34. 4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature? With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated. (ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant? Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference. 5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear? Yes 6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published (i) as it is (ii) with minor modifications (iii) with major modifications (iv) rejected Specific comments, if any: -Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2. [ Last edited by 尋找光陰 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ] |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
鐵桿木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
專家顧問 (知名作家)
學習使人進步
![]() |
專家經驗: +1781 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 296材料專碩求調劑 +12 | 202451007219 2026-04-02 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 279求調劑 +3 | qazplm0852 2026-04-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調劑 +5 | AZMK 2026-04-02 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調劑 +12 | 舟自梗 2026-04-01 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調劑,計算材料方向 +10 | 吸喵有害笙命 2026-04-01 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調劑 +5 | 勵志一定發(fā)文章 2026-04-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 372求調劑 +3 | jj涌77 2026-04-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 270調劑 +7 | maxjxbsk 2026-04-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑,一志愿南京師范大學計算機專碩,初試373,六級通過, +3 | 計算機追夢人 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調劑 +17 | 木蟲er12138 2026-04-01 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 320分,材料與化工專業(yè),求調劑 +14 | 一定上岸aaa 2026-03-27 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 086502化學工程342求調劑 +7 | 阿姨復古不過 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿南師大334求調劑 +4 | seven7yu 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程302調劑環(huán)化或化工 +15 | Doleres 2026-03-31 | 16/800 |
|
|
[有機交流]
10+3
|
kaobao456 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學0703總分337求調劑 +6 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,專業(yè)課化工原理,321分求調劑 +5 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 調劑求收留 +7 | 果然有我 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|