 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5479 | 回復: 27 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
mlshmily木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
Revise-大修還是小修？第二個審稿人什么意思？ 已有14人參與
|
||
|
收到Elsevier期刊的審稿意見：Revise。 但不知道大修還是小修，似乎是Elsevier的審稿意見模板。好像是修改重投，是新投稿嗎？ 另外，第二個審稿人什么意思？有人說比較危險，他是拒審的意思，可能因為論文太差了。 還有戲嗎？ 請明白人點撥一二。謝謝！ Dear XXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed. First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……... Second, ……. Third, the paper should shorten the section on ……. Fourth, …… Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3). I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area. Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned. |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復
-
英一數(shù)一408，總分284，二戰(zhàn)真誠求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復
-
085410 一志愿211 22408分數(shù)359求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
271求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有19人回復
-
385分 生物學（071000）求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
一志愿安徽大學計算機科學與技術學碩，331分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
318求調(diào)劑，計算材料方向
已經(jīng)有8人回復
-
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有25人回復
-
一志愿北京科技大學085601材料工程英一數(shù)二初試總分335求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
一志愿北京科技，085601總分305求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 審稿意見求助(是小修還是大改？)
已經(jīng)有13人回復
- 第一次投稿 大修后又要大修 各位幫忙看下 希望大不 謝謝啦
已經(jīng)有12人回復
- 大家請幫我看看這個審稿意見是什么意思？
已經(jīng)有7人回復
- JACS的article投稿兩周后返回，一大修，另一個小修
已經(jīng)有18人回復
- 審稿人一個拒稿一個大修，編輯給大修，求助
已經(jīng)有26人回復
- applied energy 審稿意見是revise，嘛意思呢~~~
已經(jīng)有18人回復
- Journal of membrane science修改求助！
已經(jīng)有6人回復
- JPCC大修后一個月了還沒有消息。。。。。。。。。
已經(jīng)有13人回復
- 論文兩個審稿人讓小修，一個審稿人拒絕，結果編輯拒稿了，這種情況還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有41人回復
- chemical communications小修，審稿人意見請教
已經(jīng)有8人回復
- 審稿意見，小修，有些問題不明白
已經(jīng)有4人回復
- 論文修改第二次了，也沒有寫大修還是小修，都是revise，第二次修改都半個月還沒消息
已經(jīng)有12人回復
- BT的問題，為什么審稿專家的是minor revise，而系統(tǒng)里編輯給的是 major？？
已經(jīng)有24人回復
- 論文小修還用返給審稿人嗎
已經(jīng)有13人回復
- 審稿意見：一個大修，兩個小修
已經(jīng)有34人回復
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意見了，這個算大修還是小修？ Physica A
已經(jīng)有11人回復
- PRB這樣的審稿意見算是大修還是小修？
已經(jīng)有6人回復
- 小修沒有完全回答審稿人意見，會不會悲劇啊？
已經(jīng)有21人回復
- 請問這是審稿人的意見還是編輯的意見（投稿十天后給發(fā)的郵件），中的可能性大嗎？
已經(jīng)有24人回復
- Moderate Revise 后會換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有4人回復
- Revise and Resubmit 之后審稿還是原來審稿人嗎
已經(jīng)有9人回復
- 請看下這個是大修還是小修
已經(jīng)有18人回復
- 幫忙分析一下這個審稿意見如何？先謝謝各位
已經(jīng)有9人回復
kingki
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應助: 465 (碩士)
- 金幣: 23654.3
- 散金: 6301
- 紅花: 18
- 帖子: 7935
- 在線: 601.3小時
- 蟲號: 514983
- 注冊: 2008-02-29
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 電化學
4樓2014-02-05 00:22:54
Fung66
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 39 (小學生)
- 金幣: 6931.4
- 散金: 2828
- 紅花: 29
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 1870
- 在線: 1051.4小時
- 蟲號: 2840774
- 注冊: 2013-12-01
- 專業(yè): 無機非金屬類光電信息與功
2樓2014-02-05 00:08:48
miingbo
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應助: 11 (小學生)
- 金幣: 515.1
- 帖子: 30
- 在線: 39.8小時
- 蟲號: 1375599
- 注冊: 2011-08-22
- 專業(yè): 信號理論與信號處理
★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
|
我覺得審稿人2認為你的研究方向是好的，但是懷疑你的研究結論:“wasn't convinced that ……achieved that much apart from saying the obvious.” 除此之外，兩個審稿人都認為文章邏輯結構以及語言存在很大的問題。 我覺得你是不是推理過程不足以支撐你的結論，有點言過其實了，直白說就是有點吹了 這個真要好好的改一改，先飽滿點增加工作量把問題闡述清楚，然后再組織邏輯結構，最后改語言吧 [ 發(fā)自手機版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
3樓2014-02-05 00:16:54
mlshmily
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 18 (小學生)
- 金幣: 3640.7
- 散金: 15
- 紅花: 15
- 帖子: 1543
- 在線: 330.2小時
- 蟲號: 82703
- 注冊: 2005-07-26
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 管理經(jīng)濟學
5樓2014-02-05 00:33:08
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學279求調(diào)劑 +15 | 哈哈哈^_^ 2026-03-31 | 17/850 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研]
 重慶大學材料與化工085600，初試370+，求求調(diào)劑建議
+3
|
shzhou_ 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，320分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大饞小子 2026-04-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)調(diào)劑 +5 | 啦啦啦哭 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703求調(diào)劑 +4 | zizimo 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 省雙一流重點一本大學招收調(diào)劑 +4 | wwwwffffff 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +4 | 想上學求調(diào) 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥298調(diào)劑求助 +4 | 元元青青 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +18 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 18/900 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研生物與醫(yī)藥調(diào)劑 +7 | 鐵憨憨123425 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京科技大學材料學碩328分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 1段時間 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601英二數(shù)二求調(diào)劑 總分325 +4 | 余航航 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +10 | 陳晨79 2026-03-30 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | GK72 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研]
304材料求調(diào)劑
+5
|
鐘llll 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +4 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085701求調(diào)劑初試286分 +5 | secret0328 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +10 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +12 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學碩求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|