| 查看: 5452 | 回復(fù): 27 | |||
mlshmily木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
Revise-大修還是小修?第二個審稿人什么意思? 已有14人參與
|
||
|
收到Elsevier期刊的審稿意見:Revise。 但不知道大修還是小修,似乎是Elsevier的審稿意見模板。好像是修改重投,是新投稿嗎? 另外,第二個審稿人什么意思?有人說比較危險,他是拒審的意思,可能因為論文太差了。 還有戲嗎? 請明白人點撥一二。謝謝! Dear XXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed. First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……... Second, ……. Third, the paper should shorten the section on ……. Fourth, …… Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3). I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area. Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned. |
木蟲 (著名寫手)

新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
我覺得審稿人2認(rèn)為你的研究方向是好的,但是懷疑你的研究結(jié)論:“wasn't convinced that ……achieved that much apart from saying the obvious.” 除此之外,兩個審稿人都認(rèn)為文章邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)以及語言存在很大的問題。 我覺得你是不是推理過程不足以支撐你的結(jié)論,有點言過其實了,直白說就是有點吹了 這個真要好好的改一改,先飽滿點增加工作量把問題闡述清楚,然后再組織邏輯結(jié)構(gòu),最后改語言吧 [ 發(fā)自手機版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
碩士

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
獵手

木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +12 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +3 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項目,四級已過 +6 | 幸運哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +6 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑一志愿211 +3 | 上岸6666@ 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +6 | shansx 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工306 +4 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求助 +5 | 夢里的無言 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +3 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0805材料320求調(diào)劑 +3 | 深海物語 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +9 | 簡單點0 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jack?k?y 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +4 | ydfyh 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ,070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +9 | 何潤采123 2026-03-18 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
不想起名字112 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|