| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5475 | 回復(fù): 27 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
mlshmily木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
Revise-大修還是小修?第二個(gè)審稿人什么意思? 已有14人參與
|
||
|
收到Elsevier期刊的審稿意見:Revise。 但不知道大修還是小修,似乎是Elsevier的審稿意見模板。好像是修改重投,是新投稿嗎? 另外,第二個(gè)審稿人什么意思?有人說比較危險(xiǎn),他是拒審的意思,可能因?yàn)檎撐奶盍恕?br /> 還有戲嗎? 請(qǐng)明白人點(diǎn)撥一二。謝謝! Dear XXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed. First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……... Second, ……. Third, the paper should shorten the section on ……. Fourth, …… Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3). I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area. Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned. |
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
獵手

木蟲 (著名寫手)

新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
我覺得審稿人2認(rèn)為你的研究方向是好的,但是懷疑你的研究結(jié)論:“wasn't convinced that ……achieved that much apart from saying the obvious.” 除此之外,兩個(gè)審稿人都認(rèn)為文章邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)以及語言存在很大的問題。 我覺得你是不是推理過程不足以支撐你的結(jié)論,有點(diǎn)言過其實(shí)了,直白說就是有點(diǎn)吹了 這個(gè)真要好好的改一改,先飽滿點(diǎn)增加工作量把問題闡述清楚,然后再組織邏輯結(jié)構(gòu),最后改語言吧 [ 發(fā)自手機(jī)版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +5 | 亞克西good 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué) 296 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +14 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑 +11 | 麻辣魷魚 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿:西北大學(xué),英一數(shù)一408-284分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 12.27 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +8 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 277跪求調(diào)劑 +7 | 1915668 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程334分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 王一一依依 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +10 | 景隨風(fēng) 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +4 | wcq131415 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +10 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +8 | 楒桉 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | dfffsar 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +6 | Amber00 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +8 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +3 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 安徽大學(xué)專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分,英語已過四六級(jí),六級(jí)521,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|