| 查看: 5454 | 回復: 27 | |||
mlshmily木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
Revise-大修還是小修?第二個審稿人什么意思? 已有14人參與
|
||
|
收到Elsevier期刊的審稿意見:Revise。 但不知道大修還是小修,似乎是Elsevier的審稿意見模板。好像是修改重投,是新投稿嗎? 另外,第二個審稿人什么意思?有人說比較危險,他是拒審的意思,可能因為論文太差了。 還有戲嗎? 請明白人點撥一二。謝謝! Dear XXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), the Editor In Chief invites you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript addressed an interesting and potentially promising topic. Also, it is obvious that the authors did an extensive search on the existing reports and research literature. However, I feel that this paper have some areas that need to be addressed. First, I disagree with the authors' organization of contents……... Second, ……. Third, the paper should shorten the section on ……. Fourth, …… Finally, the writing in some sections can be improved (e.g., the last paragraph in page 3). I hope the authors find the review helpful and wish them good luck with their research in this area. Reviewer #2: The work is interesting but I wasn't convinced that the discussion or conclusions achieved that much apart from saying the obvious. I did like the way the discussion drew down data from a number of sources thus providing an uninformed reader with a range of good background facts and figures. I would have preferred to see more ambition in the paper's aim. There are many minor errors - often the definite article is missed out, quite a number of spelling errors, some references are very old yet are used to support current understanding. These all need attention. I thought the sources of data were in need of more care. There are other sources that are probably better than some that are mentioned. |
木蟲 (著名寫手)

新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
我覺得審稿人2認為你的研究方向是好的,但是懷疑你的研究結論:“wasn't convinced that ……achieved that much apart from saying the obvious.” 除此之外,兩個審稿人都認為文章邏輯結構以及語言存在很大的問題。 我覺得你是不是推理過程不足以支撐你的結論,有點言過其實了,直白說就是有點吹了 這個真要好好的改一改,先飽滿點增加工作量把問題闡述清楚,然后再組織邏輯結構,最后改語言吧 [ 發(fā)自手機版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
碩士

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
獵手

木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[論文投稿] 急發(fā)核心期刊論文 +3 | 賢達問津 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國農業(yè)大學-求調劑 +10 | 手機用戶 2026-03-17 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調劑 +5 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調劑 +9 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調劑 +11 | 梨花珞晚風 2026-03-17 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中農業(yè)071010,總分320求調劑 +5 | 困困困困坤坤 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調劑 +4 | 來好運來來來 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調劑 +10 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 初試 317 +7 | 半拉月丙 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩 348分求調劑 +3 | 冬辭. 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿深大,0703化學,總分302,求調劑 +4 | 七月-七七 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請]
學校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC,還能修改嗎?
40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求 B區(qū) 調劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調劑 +3 | 鳳凰院丁真 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調劑 +3 | Jack?k?y 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 南京大學化學376求調劑 +3 | hisfailed 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調劑 +4 | 一志愿京區(qū)211 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|