| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 909 | 回復: 6 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
islestar銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯催@篇文章還有改得必要嗎?
|
||
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors performed meta-analyses of the survivals after radio-frequent ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria. The main finding of their review was increased local control rate by hepatic resection with improved disease-free survivals. Unfortunately, similar reviews or meta-analysis were already published in the literatures as the followings. Moreover, the discussion of this article is very poor with only 3 references. #1. Please make the discussion more concise with referring previous reviews and show how this analysis is different from the previous ones. #2. The backgrounds of the patients need to be compared between the RFA and surgery. 1. Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1210-24. 2. Liu JG, Wang YJ, Du Z.Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 21;16(27):3450-6. 3. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Xu D, Yin Z, Xie F, Yang J. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 9;10:78. 4. Xu G, Qi FZ, Zhang JH, Cheng GF, Cai Y, Miao Y. Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 16;10:163. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This is a systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs comparing survival and disease recurrence rates after surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. This study has a few drawbacks. 1) As the authors stated in the Results section, the 4 RCTs had moderate methodological quality, with a mean Jadad score of 2.75. The quality of reporting with a Jadad score below 3 is categorized as poor. Therefore, the systematic review analyzing such RCTs as well as non-RCTs lacks quality. |
Cover_Letter |
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
s
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (文學泰斗)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 298求調劑 +3 | 種圣賜 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 356求調劑 +4 | gysy?s?a 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調劑 +4 | 種圣賜 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調劑 +4 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學求調劑 +9 | 奶油草莓. 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程,267求調劑 +16 | minht 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 調劑 +3 | 好好讀書。 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277跪求調劑 +5 | 1915668 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +3 | 希望上岸阿小楊 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程求調劑 +9 | 多久上課 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學 070300 學碩 336分 求調劑 +9 | vv迷 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分調劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學一志愿南京師范大學303求調劑 +3 | zzffylgg 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調劑 +8 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學/生化與分子/生物信息學相關調劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 336化工調劑 +4 | 王大坦1 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|