| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 908 | 回復(fù): 6 | |||
islestar銀蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯催@篇文章還有改得必要嗎?
|
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors performed meta-analyses of the survivals after radio-frequent ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria. The main finding of their review was increased local control rate by hepatic resection with improved disease-free survivals. Unfortunately, similar reviews or meta-analysis were already published in the literatures as the followings. Moreover, the discussion of this article is very poor with only 3 references. #1. Please make the discussion more concise with referring previous reviews and show how this analysis is different from the previous ones. #2. The backgrounds of the patients need to be compared between the RFA and surgery. 1. Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1210-24. 2. Liu JG, Wang YJ, Du Z.Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 21;16(27):3450-6. 3. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Xu D, Yin Z, Xie F, Yang J. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 9;10:78. 4. Xu G, Qi FZ, Zhang JH, Cheng GF, Cai Y, Miao Y. Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 16;10:163. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This is a systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs comparing survival and disease recurrence rates after surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. This study has a few drawbacks. 1) As the authors stated in the Results section, the 4 RCTs had moderate methodological quality, with a mean Jadad score of 2.75. The quality of reporting with a Jadad score below 3 is categorized as poor. Therefore, the systematic review analyzing such RCTs as well as non-RCTs lacks quality. |
Cover_Letter |
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
s
銀蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
銀蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文學(xué)泰斗)
版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 2026年華南師范大學(xué)歡迎化學(xué),化工,生物,生醫(yī)工等專業(yè)優(yōu)秀學(xué)子加入! +3 | llss0711 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +7 | 宋明欣 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +4 | @MZB382400 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311(085601)求調(diào)劑 +4 | liziyeyeye 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)0703 調(diào)劑 306分 一志愿211 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
孅華 2026-03-22 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | 丟掉懶惰 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +7 | 孅華 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑11408 +3 | 劉小鹿lu 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑,一志愿南農(nóng)083200食品科學(xué)與工程 +5 | XQTJZ 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | question挽風(fēng) 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實(shí)習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +4 | 贈(zèng)我一本書(shū) 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂(lè)樂(lè)樂(lè) 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 請(qǐng)教下大家 2026年國(guó)家基金申請(qǐng)是雙盲審嗎? +3 | lishucheng1 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 280分求調(diào)劑 一志愿085802 +4 | PUMPT 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|