| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 912 | 回復(fù): 6 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
islestar銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯催@篇文章還有改得必要嗎?
|
||
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors performed meta-analyses of the survivals after radio-frequent ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria. The main finding of their review was increased local control rate by hepatic resection with improved disease-free survivals. Unfortunately, similar reviews or meta-analysis were already published in the literatures as the followings. Moreover, the discussion of this article is very poor with only 3 references. #1. Please make the discussion more concise with referring previous reviews and show how this analysis is different from the previous ones. #2. The backgrounds of the patients need to be compared between the RFA and surgery. 1. Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1210-24. 2. Liu JG, Wang YJ, Du Z.Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 21;16(27):3450-6. 3. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Xu D, Yin Z, Xie F, Yang J. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 9;10:78. 4. Xu G, Qi FZ, Zhang JH, Cheng GF, Cai Y, Miao Y. Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 16;10:163. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This is a systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs comparing survival and disease recurrence rates after surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. This study has a few drawbacks. 1) As the authors stated in the Results section, the 4 RCTs had moderate methodological quality, with a mean Jadad score of 2.75. The quality of reporting with a Jadad score below 3 is categorized as poor. Therefore, the systematic review analyzing such RCTs as well as non-RCTs lacks quality. |
Cover_Letter |
新蟲 (正式寫手)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
s
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +9 | 景隨風(fēng) 2026-03-29 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +8 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +5 | BrightLL 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學(xué)abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +9 | 多久上課 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +4 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 279 分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睡個(gè)好覺_16 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +10 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑推薦 +5 | 清酒714 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個(gè)楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 081700 調(diào)劑 267分 +11 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
黃粱一夢(mèng)千年 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯?xiàng)l 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|