| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 911 | 回復(fù): 6 | |||
islestar銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯催@篇文章還有改得必要嗎?
|
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors performed meta-analyses of the survivals after radio-frequent ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria. The main finding of their review was increased local control rate by hepatic resection with improved disease-free survivals. Unfortunately, similar reviews or meta-analysis were already published in the literatures as the followings. Moreover, the discussion of this article is very poor with only 3 references. #1. Please make the discussion more concise with referring previous reviews and show how this analysis is different from the previous ones. #2. The backgrounds of the patients need to be compared between the RFA and surgery. 1. Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1210-24. 2. Liu JG, Wang YJ, Du Z.Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 21;16(27):3450-6. 3. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Xu D, Yin Z, Xie F, Yang J. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 9;10:78. 4. Xu G, Qi FZ, Zhang JH, Cheng GF, Cai Y, Miao Y. Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 16;10:163. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This is a systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs comparing survival and disease recurrence rates after surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. This study has a few drawbacks. 1) As the authors stated in the Results section, the 4 RCTs had moderate methodological quality, with a mean Jadad score of 2.75. The quality of reporting with a Jadad score below 3 is categorized as poor. Therefore, the systematic review analyzing such RCTs as well as non-RCTs lacks quality. |
Cover_Letter |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
s
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (文學(xué)泰斗)
版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 7 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程085602 305分求調(diào)劑 +18 | RichLi_ 2026-03-25 | 18/900 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿:西北大學(xué),英一數(shù)一408-284分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 12.27 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 2026年華南師范大學(xué)歡迎化學(xué),化工,生物,生醫(yī)工等專業(yè)優(yōu)秀學(xué)子加入! +3 | llss0711 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +7 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | raojunqi0129 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程,267求調(diào)劑 +16 | minht 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +15 | hhhhxn.. 2026-03-23 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
材料調(diào)劑
5+4
|
想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程 317求調(diào)劑 +4 | JKSOIID 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +6 | Koxui 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境專碩324分求調(diào)劑推薦 +5 | 軒小寧—— 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 300分,材料,求調(diào)劑,英一數(shù)二 +5 | 超贊的 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
黃粱一夢千年 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料/農(nóng)業(yè)專業(yè),07/08開頭均可,過線就行 +3 | 呵唔哦豁 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070300,一志愿北航320求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jerry0216 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|