| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2888 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
angela1ying鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
CEJ小修 審稿意見(jiàn)看不懂 已有2人參與
|
|
小妹第一次回復(fù)審稿意見(jiàn),什么都不懂,請(qǐng)大家?guī)蛶兔Π。?br />
第一個(gè)審稿人,有兩個(gè)地方看不懂。 1.Catalyst characterization is well performed and linked to activity tests, but for some DRX studies that should be performed on the spent catalysts (both the LDH-based and the obtained by incipient wetting) so to complete table 3 and related discussion. 催化劑有DRX這個(gè)表征嗎?是什么?還是打錯(cuò)了,是XRD? 2.Regarding section 3.3, discussion could be extended by calculating TOFs at zero time for the catalysts used, not only the catalyst performance at high time values. Though, from an industrial point of view, these latter ones are the interesting ones, reaction rates are proportional to TOFs calculated at zero time, and they can suggest even higher differences in activity. As hydrogen seems to saturate at pressures higher than 5 MPa (though this is not stated by authors at the end of page 16), it is probable than hydrogenation kinetics could be simplified to first order, so the kinetic constants could be calculated instead of TOFs (and more discussion performed on this basis). 一開(kāi)始叫我算TOF,后面又說(shuō)instead of ?啥意思。康降资撬氵是不算? 第二個(gè)審稿人。 In my opinion the article, however, lack information about the reproducibility of the results, both in the production of the catalyst i.e. parameters achieved by it, as well as the results of the proposed process. 這個(gè)reproducibility指的是什么的重現(xiàn)性。 [ 發(fā)自手機(jī)版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
專家顧問(wèn) (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
專家顧問(wèn) (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
第一個(gè)審稿人 1.Catalyst characterization is well performed and linked to activity tests, but for some DRX studies that should 沒(méi)聽(tīng)說(shuō)過(guò)DRX,應(yīng)該是XRD 2.Regarding section 3.3, discussion could be extended by calculating TOFs at zero time for the catalysts used, not only the catalyst performance at high time values. Though, from an industrial point of view, these latter ones are the interesting ones, reaction rates are proportional to TOFs calculated at zero time, and they can suggest even higher differences in activity. 你應(yīng)該算開(kāi)始的TOF,看樣子是你只算了后面的TOF,沒(méi)算開(kāi)始的。因?yàn)閷徃迦苏J(rèn)為zero time TOF更能看出催化活性的區(qū)別。 As hydrogen seems to saturate at pressures higher than 5 MPa (though this is not stated by authors at the end of page 16), it is probable than hydrogenation kinetics could be simplified to first order, so the kinetic constants could be calculated instead of TOFs (and more discussion performed on this basis). 這段是說(shuō)壓力大于5 MPa后,催化劑可能已經(jīng)飽和,氫化過(guò)程有可能簡(jiǎn)化為一級(jí)動(dòng)力學(xué),這樣就可以算出動(dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)了。因?yàn)閯?dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)比TOF更通用,可以算出來(lái)就不要用TOF來(lái)比較和討論實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果。 這兩段不矛盾,因?yàn)閴毫π〉臅r(shí)候動(dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)算不出來(lái),所以你比較催化活性就用TOF,只是要把zero time TOF也包括進(jìn)來(lái)。 第二個(gè)審稿人。 In my opinion the article, however, lack information about the reproducibility of the results, both in the production of the catalyst i.e. parameters achieved by it, as well as the results of the proposed process. information about reproducibility 用人話說(shuō)就是實(shí)驗(yàn)重復(fù)了沒(méi)有?重復(fù)了幾次?誤差如何?我只是很震驚你報(bào)數(shù)據(jù)沒(méi)報(bào)誤差,難道不都是 平均值±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差 這樣的格式嗎?再用腳注說(shuō)明平均值是多少次重復(fù)實(shí)驗(yàn) |
專家顧問(wèn) (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
你好厲害,說(shuō)的很到點(diǎn)呢。 可是我的文章里面根本就沒(méi)有計(jì)算TOFs,全部用一定時(shí)間的轉(zhuǎn)化率來(lái)做對(duì)比,只有一個(gè)圖是隨時(shí)間的轉(zhuǎn)化率變化。突然計(jì)算一個(gè)0min時(shí)候的TOF是不是很突兀啊? 如果全部換成TOF的話,其他因素下也要隨時(shí)間變化來(lái)取樣才能計(jì)算對(duì)嗎?這樣要補(bǔ)做很多實(shí)驗(yàn)呀?怎么辦? 還有高于5MPa的時(shí)候又莫名多一個(gè)動(dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)?如何銜接呀? 沒(méi)有報(bào)誤差,數(shù)據(jù)沒(méi)有列出來(lái),全部做成曲線放在圖里面了。那我是不是要說(shuō)做過(guò)3次實(shí)驗(yàn),去的平均值這樣? 謝謝啊 |
|
好吧,我估計(jì)審稿人把轉(zhuǎn)化率看成TOF了,實(shí)在不行你就好好解釋一下,說(shuō)數(shù)據(jù)只在固定時(shí)間取的,補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)要花很多時(shí)間之類的,哭一下。而且感覺(jué)這個(gè)只是建議,不是必須做的。如果你還有別的數(shù)據(jù)就加進(jìn)來(lái)討論一下吧,沒(méi)有就算了。 動(dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)那個(gè)是針對(duì)高壓力的情況,如果有對(duì)這部分的討論,盡量用動(dòng)力學(xué)常數(shù)。不過(guò)也是建議了。你有別的理由可以回復(fù)給審稿人。 數(shù)據(jù)作成表也可以加入誤差范圍吧,比如數(shù)據(jù)點(diǎn)上可以畫error bar表示誤差,再說(shuō)明是怎么算的。 [ 發(fā)自手機(jī)版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑,是學(xué)校就去 +3 | sllhht 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +8 | 何潤(rùn)采123 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 【考研調(diào)劑】化學(xué)專業(yè) 281分,一志愿四川大學(xué),誠(chéng)心求調(diào)劑 +5 | 吃吃吃才有意義 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學(xué)課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +4 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +3 | ydfyh 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +11 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-求調(diào)劑 +7 | 手機(jī)用戶 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 總分331 +3 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中:新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了,假專家開(kāi)始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研求調(diào)劑 +6 | 丶宏Sir 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 211本,11408一志愿中科院277分,曾在中科院自動(dòng)化所實(shí)習(xí) +6 | Losir 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒(méi)有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個(gè)二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械專碩325,尋找調(diào)劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yanyali 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調(diào)劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國(guó)石油大學(xué)(華東)305分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 嘉年新程 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +3 | 5201314Lsy! 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 085600 260分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 天空還下雨么 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|