| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2891 | 回復: 8 | |||
angela1ying鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
CEJ小修 審稿意見看不懂 已有2人參與
|
|
小妹第一次回復審稿意見,什么都不懂,請大家?guī)蛶兔Π。?br />
第一個審稿人,有兩個地方看不懂。 1.Catalyst characterization is well performed and linked to activity tests, but for some DRX studies that should be performed on the spent catalysts (both the LDH-based and the obtained by incipient wetting) so to complete table 3 and related discussion. 催化劑有DRX這個表征嗎?是什么?還是打錯了,是XRD? 2.Regarding section 3.3, discussion could be extended by calculating TOFs at zero time for the catalysts used, not only the catalyst performance at high time values. Though, from an industrial point of view, these latter ones are the interesting ones, reaction rates are proportional to TOFs calculated at zero time, and they can suggest even higher differences in activity. As hydrogen seems to saturate at pressures higher than 5 MPa (though this is not stated by authors at the end of page 16), it is probable than hydrogenation kinetics could be simplified to first order, so the kinetic constants could be calculated instead of TOFs (and more discussion performed on this basis). 一開始叫我算TOF,后面又說instead of ?啥意思啊?到底是算還是不算? 第二個審稿人。 In my opinion the article, however, lack information about the reproducibility of the results, both in the production of the catalyst i.e. parameters achieved by it, as well as the results of the proposed process. 這個reproducibility指的是什么的重現(xiàn)性啊? [ 發(fā)自手機版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
專家顧問 (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
專家顧問 (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
第一個審稿人 1.Catalyst characterization is well performed and linked to activity tests, but for some DRX studies that should 沒聽說過DRX,應該是XRD 2.Regarding section 3.3, discussion could be extended by calculating TOFs at zero time for the catalysts used, not only the catalyst performance at high time values. Though, from an industrial point of view, these latter ones are the interesting ones, reaction rates are proportional to TOFs calculated at zero time, and they can suggest even higher differences in activity. 你應該算開始的TOF,看樣子是你只算了后面的TOF,沒算開始的。因為審稿人認為zero time TOF更能看出催化活性的區(qū)別。 As hydrogen seems to saturate at pressures higher than 5 MPa (though this is not stated by authors at the end of page 16), it is probable than hydrogenation kinetics could be simplified to first order, so the kinetic constants could be calculated instead of TOFs (and more discussion performed on this basis). 這段是說壓力大于5 MPa后,催化劑可能已經(jīng)飽和,氫化過程有可能簡化為一級動力學,這樣就可以算出動力學常數(shù)了。因為動力學常數(shù)比TOF更通用,可以算出來就不要用TOF來比較和討論實驗結(jié)果。 這兩段不矛盾,因為壓力小的時候動力學常數(shù)算不出來,所以你比較催化活性就用TOF,只是要把zero time TOF也包括進來。 第二個審稿人。 In my opinion the article, however, lack information about the reproducibility of the results, both in the production of the catalyst i.e. parameters achieved by it, as well as the results of the proposed process. information about reproducibility 用人話說就是實驗重復了沒有?重復了幾次?誤差如何?我只是很震驚你報數(shù)據(jù)沒報誤差,難道不都是 平均值±標準差 這樣的格式嗎?再用腳注說明平均值是多少次重復實驗 |
專家顧問 (著名寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +218 |
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
好吧,我估計審稿人把轉(zhuǎn)化率看成TOF了,實在不行你就好好解釋一下,說數(shù)據(jù)只在固定時間取的,補實驗要花很多時間之類的,哭一下。而且感覺這個只是建議,不是必須做的。如果你還有別的數(shù)據(jù)就加進來討論一下吧,沒有就算了。 動力學常數(shù)那個是針對高壓力的情況,如果有對這部分的討論,盡量用動力學常數(shù)。不過也是建議了。你有別的理由可以回復給審稿人。 數(shù)據(jù)作成表也可以加入誤差范圍吧,比如數(shù)據(jù)點上可以畫error bar表示誤差,再說明是怎么算的。 [ 發(fā)自手機版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 暗涌afhb 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上學吖吖 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國海洋大學,生物學,301分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
不想起名字112 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑,是學校就去 +6 | sllhht 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +3 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學,327分,材料與化工085600 +3 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學,080502,354分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 守候夕陽CF 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +6 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學-求調(diào)劑 +7 | 手機用戶 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 331求調(diào)劑(0703有機化學 +7 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +5 | 時間點 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yanyali 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 080500,材料學碩302分求調(diào)劑學校 +4 | 初識可樂 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化,一志愿:哈工大 本人本科雙一流 +4 | 自由的_飛翔 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 招收0805(材料)調(diào)劑 +3 | 18595523086 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|